Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ridiculous...you should lose people when the answer shows that much ignorance and lack of understanding of the recent past when it applies to our largest financial crisis in decades.
Not for long. Cain is gonna fall from the top, but Fox will try to prevent that. I'd imagine the establishment is counting on white guilt to keep Cain in the race. He is the Republican Magical Negro after all. I've seen it with posters about Marco Rubio on here and Alan West. Republicans are not racist, but at the subconscious level they still want to prove to the idiot liberal media that they are not because mainstream conservatives are wrapped up in PC just as much as the liberals are
Either get behind Romney, or you will give it up to Obama again in 2012. I voted for Obama, and I'm ready to kick him out on his skinny behind, but I would have voted for Romney if he had gotten the nomination last time. No one cares about his religion - we need someone with the brains to lead the country. Rick Perry? Ick. The media is trying desperatly to build up Cain, but he has about as much appeal to those of us who are moderates as Sarah Palin did, and that's zippo, zilch.
I agree. Romney is the one. Cain's 9-9-9 is gimmicky and misguided. He's not the one. Ponzi proved to be a dud. Bachmann's brand of gay crazy has very limited appeal. It's Romney. Nominate the guy already.
I agree. Romney is the one. Cain's 9-9-9 is gimmicky and misguided. He's not the one. Ponzi proved to be a dud. Bachmann's brand of gay crazy has very limited appeal. It's Romney. Nominate the guy already.
Why not Ron Paul? The competition is basically between those 2. Everyone else, except Paul and Romney, are flavors of the month
Before I read this thread, I'm going to spit out my take.
I thought Mitt did outstanding, I can't help but like the man and do believe he comes away as the winner tonight. I place Newt as 2nd.
I'm still voting for Ron Paul!
Cain was awful imo, I just don't like his arrogance and condescending attitude. I also don't like 999
Mitt proves with every debate that he's going to be serious trouble for Obama. Tonight he was convincingly compassionate. I was very skeptical about Mitt until these debates. He's the real deal.
Why not Ron Paul? The competition is basically between those 2. Everyone else, except Paul and Romney, are flavors of the month
Brain, I seriously considered voting for Paul at one point. I was buying into the dream that a man can rise and upset the system. He's got a fatal, and I mean fatal, flaw though. Those highly charged racist newsletters from the 90s. He's just not going to recover from those, Brain. The media isn't hammering him about them right now because he's still fringe, but the second he rises to the number two slot he will be swatted out of it swiftly. I think the guy has a lot of good ideas, and he seems like a nice enough fellow -- but you can't be David Duke in a former life and go on to be president.
Brain, I seriously considered voting for Paul at one point. I was buying into the dream that a man can rise and upset the system. He's got a fatal, and I mean fatal, flaw though. Those highly charged racist newsletters from the 90s. He's just not going to recover from those, Brain. The media isn't hammering him about them right now because he's still fringe, but the second he rises to the number two slot he will be swatted out of it swiftly. I think the guy has a lot of good ideas, and he seems like a nice enough fellow -- but you can't be David Duke in a former life and go on to be president.
The newsletters have been brought up over and over...and put to rest over and over, the news letters are no excuse. Paul is clearly not a racist, its not possible to be racist and support a libertarian platform such as he does.
The newsletters have been brought up over and over...and put to rest over and over, the news letters are no excuse. Paul is clearly not a racist, its not possible to be racist and support a libertarian platform such as he does.
t, they haven't been put to rest at all. They're out there. They have Ron Paul's name on them. They're really racist. I would be more than happy to read any source or link you have that you think effectively puts this issue to rest, but I just don't see it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
