Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-06-2011, 08:41 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,591,490 times
Reputation: 18521

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
There is a little more to it than that. None of us are 100% right, and yes, sometimes you do have to compromise.

Nita
You may, but...
I have never compromised on my values! Ever!


I think I see the problem!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-06-2011, 09:11 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,928,124 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by TCAS007 View Post
Calm down, you are not Ron Paul

Let's take Germany. France, UK and even the Canadians are still present there. The Russians left just a couple of years ago because they ran out of money.


Having a military base in an allied country is not occupying at all. You mentioned France. People in France may we strange but they were waiting for the US to. one help in WW2 and so did most countries. They were thankful when someone came to liberate them from the Nazi occupancy.
You are trying to use Facts and Logic with those that do not want to hear it, there are none so blind as those that refuse to see. But good post anyway
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 09:15 AM
 
Location: Chicago
865 posts, read 675,749 times
Reputation: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by TCAS007 View Post
Calm down, you are not Ron Paul

Let's take Germany. France, UK and even the Canadians are still present there. The Russians left just a couple of years ago because they ran out of money.


Having a military base in an allied country is not occupying at all. You mentioned France. People in France may we strange but they were waiting for the US to. one help in WW2 and so did most countries. They were thankful when someone came to liberate them from the Nazi occupancy.

Yes, but now we take off one of the most expensive responsibilities of a nation from these countries, and then they can no longer afford their socialized programs and other goodies, at the cost of the American taxpayers. Of course, some nations do appreciate our occupancy, but it hurts the US. Not all cases for occupancy are the same. Some are welcome, some are not, and each case has it's pro's and cons. Not one of the cases bears a better cost:benefit for us, nor does it make the US more secure at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,952 posts, read 17,848,920 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by TCAS007 View Post
Calm down, you are not Ron Paul

Let's take Germany. France, UK and even the Canadians are still present there. The Russians left just a couple of years ago because they ran out of money.
That makes sense. Nothing to do with protecting our borders. Your reason is because others are doing so why not us.

Why do you think Russia ran out of money? Couldn't be because they were expanding their empire and couldn't fund it, right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TCAS007 View Post
Having a military base in an allied country is not occupying at all. You mentioned France. People in France may we strange but they were waiting for the US to. one help in WW2 and so did most countries. They were thankful when someone came to liberate them from the Nazi occupancy.
Why are we in France now? To stop Germany from invading again?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 09:20 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,952 posts, read 17,848,920 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
You are trying to use Facts and Logic with those that do not want to hear it, there are none so blind as those that refuse to see. But good post anyway
Refuse to see what exactly? That almost 60 years of illegally occupying the Middle East hasn't done much except to incite hatred for America and make us less safe?

Facts and logic are lacking on your policies just as much as freedom and liberty are lacking. Society does not advance through force and coercion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 09:26 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,928,124 times
Reputation: 5932
Why are in France now? To stop Germany from invading again?

Jeeeez, some just love twisting the facts here, unfortunately for some, the truth is out there for people to find and pass on.
Follow the link below folks to where we are and where we are not, FYI France is not one of them. I would also remind the readers that this a list of actual bases, not some made up listing which includes Embassys which have a handful of troops to guard them and our representaives.
List of United States military bases - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 09:36 AM
 
12,772 posts, read 7,971,928 times
Reputation: 4332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
Why are in France now? To stop Germany from invading again?

Jeeeez, some just love twisting the facts here, unfortunately for some, the truth is out there for people to find and pass on.
Follow the link below folks to where we are and where we are not, FYI France is not one of them. I would also remind the readers that this a list of actual bases, not some made up listing which includes Embassys which have a handful of troops to guard them and our representaives.
List of United States military bases - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Here is a better source that links to official government resources listing all of our forces internationally.

PolitiFact | Ron Paul says U.S. has military personnel in 130 nations and 900 overseas bases
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,928,124 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by t206 View Post
Here is a better source that links to official government resources listing all of our forces internationally.

PolitiFact | Ron Paul says U.S. has military personnel in 130 nations and 900 overseas bases
"We're in 130 countries. We have 900 bases around the world." Per Paul
We tallied up all the countries with at least one member of the U.S. military, excluding those with personnel deemed to be "afloat." We found U.S. military personnel on the ground in a whopping 148 countries -- even more than Paul had said. (There are varying standards for what constitutes a "country," so that may explain the divergence from Paul’s number.)

However, we should add a caveat. In 56 of these 148 countries, the U.S. has less than 10 active-duty personnel present. These include such obscure locales as Mongolia, Nepal, Gabon, Togo and Suriname.

By contrast, the U.S. has disclosed only 13 countries outside the United States and its possessions that are host to more than 1,000 personnel. They are: Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom, Japan, Bahrain, Djibouti, South Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan and Kuwait.

"According to this report, the U.S. has 662 overseas bases in 38 foreign countries,"

Those are some of the facts brought up by your link, thanks by the way, and thanks for proving my point that the wild claims posted on this board as to the numbers of bases and personnel deployed are BOGUS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 10:13 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,591,490 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post


"According to this report, the U.S. has 662 overseas bases in 38 foreign countries,"

So, there are 662 bases we don't need, to defend our soil and 38 nations that can defend themselves.

Let's close them down and bring them home. WW-2 is over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Chicago
865 posts, read 675,749 times
Reputation: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
Those are some of the facts brought up by your link, thanks by the way, and thanks for proving my point that the wild claims posted on this board as to the numbers of bases and personnel deployed are BOGUS.
I have been to some of the bases not counted by that reference. They are sometimes very small(like buildings that hold 500 troops), and often a part of a co-op with other military forces, but they should still be counted.

Ron Paul is completely accurate with his assessment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top