Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
i was about to say the same thing, these are the people who do the most gripping when things don't go the way they want. This goes for people who do not vote as well, regardless of their reason for not voting. Unless you absolutely can not get out of the house because of weather or you are confined to a hospital bed everyone should vote. One time, during a primary I was in the hospital and I was only about 25 years old. I was so upset that I didn't get to vote.
Nita
Well, that's not entirely fair. In the second Clinton election, I didn't even get the CHANCE to vote before he was declared the winner. Our polls were still open, we were in line. So, there was no vote from me but not for the lack of trying. And yes I did reserve my right to b*tch and moan about him for the next four years.
The sad thing is she and others like her won't vote in the primaries and then they turn out and blindly vote in the General Election based on some skit they saw on SNL.
OMG this is so true. Disgusting, sickeningly sad but true.
I was thinking --- What if it's the same people that watched both debates? You know the 28% that is under Age 54 that watched the ABC debate is the same 28% that is under 54 that watched the Fox News Debate.
If that's true Mitt Romney will be very happy because of name recognition from 2008. That is, people who aren't paying attention at all will remember his name and vote for him.
Your links referring to what you have been saying about Ron Paul:
"Driving around 'high'..texting, cell phoning carelessly....that's Ron Paul 'Liberty."
Prove it.
Or are you going to keep talking and pretending you don't know what I meant?
EDIT:
Someone loses an argument and I get a Rep point with the following message:
"I won't embarrass myself being seen talking to you. - bye bye..LOSER"
It looks like someone just proved a point... You have no evidence to back up what you say, so you insult people. LOL Gotta love it!
Maybe "quality guy" has been reading Saul Alinsky's "Rules For Radicals"; rule number five: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." If Ron Paul wasn't a threat, what would the big deal be?
Could it be due to measuring errors? Maybe they only call people with land lines? And maybe younger people watch the debate online anytime, rather than on a TV live? It's not unusual anymore not to have land line and not to have a TV.
And the same goes as to why you and the liberals around here criticise me, pal.
Gee, I'm really sorry quality guy. I didn't read anyone saying anything bad to you except in response to your insults.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Genius, how do you 'link' your personal opinion? Teach us.
