Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
....who doesn't have a chance because Repugs like whackjobs and Huntsman actually has a brain and uses it....Repugs prefer adulterous unethical pigs like Newt and Hermie, a 2% like Mitten, nutjobs like Bachmann....
Hmmm, does that mean you think Repugs voted for Clinton? Or does it only matter when the scumbag isn't your guy?
LMAO thats great! Obama could be the liberal Democrat poster child & you are here saying he's a Republican? Beautiful & to think, you probably vote too. How about educateing us as to exactly what Republican typr policies he has enacted or what even remotely conservative stances he has taken? You do know the difference between a tax & spend liberal & a small govt Conservative right? Or are you confused into thinking that somehow a shallow inexperienced junior democratic senator from a state that simply ignores the constitution & its peoples civil rights can be anything except a self centered Liberal Democrat.
Very, very interesting how many times Huntsman's name comes up. Clearly, the guy could have made a solid run for the White House, but unfortunately he does not pass the "conservative enough" test known as the GOP primaries. I wonder how many presidential elections the GOP has to lose before they give up this obsession with "most conservative candidate wins."
As a right leaning Independent, OP was not direct at me so I'll forego answering.
....who doesn't have a chance because Repugs like whackjobs and Huntsman actually has a brain and uses it....Repugs prefer adulterous unethical pigs like Newt and Hermie, a 2% like Mitten, nutjobs like Bachmann....
Folks, here is an excellent example of how many libs are anything but open-minded and tolerant.
BTW, we've already had an unethical pig for president (William the Impeached). But since he is a Democrat, I guess it's "okay."
Yes, and while the chubby faced Vlad the impaler was going for Clinton's throat he was boinking some bug-eyed albino while his wife was sick with cancer. That's the republican version of family values, LMFAO.
Very, very interesting how many times Huntsman's name comes up. Clearly, the guy could have made a solid run for the White House, but unfortunately he does not pass the "conservative enough" test known as the GOP primaries. I wonder how many presidential elections the GOP has to lose before they give up this obsession with "most conservative candidate wins."
As a right leaning Independent, OP was not direct at me so I'll forego answering.
Their primary problem is their conservatism has become more about a sticking their heads up a woman's womb, and about being the doberman's that surround tax-free palaces to protect the ultra rich rather than being serious about getting our debt back in black.
The difference between voting for Clinton and backing Newtsie is that Clinton was already IN office when he commited his tomfoolery....but Republicans ALREADY KNOW Newtsie is a pig and WANT TO VOTE FOR HIM ANYWAY.....
PROVING they do NOT care about the morals of their candidate.
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,080,865 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCobb
As a Democrat, my preference for our next president goes in this order 1) Ron Paul, 2) Obama, 3) Huntsman, 4) Romney, 5) Santorum, 6) Gingrich, 7) Bachmann, 8) A big pile of horse$@*+, 9) Rick Perry.
1) Ron Paul, 2) Obama, 3)Roemer 4)Huntsman and the rest ARE horseshyte
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.