Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The slander focus will be on him to try to knock him off the top. He will get it from both sides. No one in Washington wants an honest man in the White House. They are very afraid of the Paul movement. He threatens their corrupt gravy train.
@NeonBlack, CNN is actually returning to becomeing a news organization once again rather than toting the MSM status quo bucket. I've been impressed both with Cafferty's coverage of Ron Paul in regard to economic policy as well as his coverage of "Operation Fast & Furous".
I think the Gov. of Iowa will follow through on his threats to attempt to further discredit the Iowa caucus results, ignorning Dr. Paul for the runner-up. I see the MSM either completely ignoring him or attacking him further with false accusations regarding racism/ a 3rd party run/ and as an appeaser of enemies Neville Chamberlain style. Of course those of us who are honest about Dr. Paul's stance on the issues know none of these are true but those who take the word of the MSM as the entirety of the research they will do on a candidate likely wil dringk the NewtRomney kool-aid.
When Paul wins Iowa both Perry and Bachmann are finished. Santorium will cling to hope as the only remaining evangelical vote magnet.
Frankly, I think if Paul reached out to Huntsman for the VP slot soon he might just take the nomination. While Huntsman is not as Constitutionally Conservative as Paul (and no one is), he has the first hand working understanding of China that the next administration will absolutely have to have to make the USA competative economically moving forward. He has a good head on his shoulders and I'd be suprised if the MSM could dig up any credible dirt on him. A Paul/Huntsman ticket would be scandal-free.
@NeonBlack, CNN is actually returning to becomeing a news organization once again rather than toting the MSM status quo bucket. I've been impressed both with Cafferty's coverage of Ron Paul in regard to economic policy as well as his coverage of "Operation Fast & Furous".
I think the Gov. of Iowa will follow through on his threats to attempt to further discredit the Iowa caucus results, ignorning Dr. Paul for the runner-up. I see the MSM either completely ignoring him or attacking him further with false accusations regarding racism/ a 3rd party run/ and as an appeaser of enemies Neville Chamberlain style. Of course those of us who are honest about Dr. Paul's stance on the issues know none of these are true but those who take the word of the MSM as the entirety of the research they will do on a candidate likely wil dringk the NewtRomney kool-aid.
When Paul wins Iowa both Perry and Bachmann are finished. Santorium will cling to hope as the only remaining evangelical vote magnet.
Frankly, I think if Paul reached out to Huntsman for the VP slot soon he might just take the nomination.
The VP running mate question was asked of all the candidates during one of the debates and Ron Paul already stated he wouldn't pick any of the other candidates as his running mate.
The VP running mate question was asked of all the candidates during one of the debates and Ron Paul already stated he wouldn't pick any of the other candidates as his running mate.
At first he said "all these candidates up here would do fine."
Then I think he didn't answer
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.