Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-26-2012, 06:52 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,941,962 times
Reputation: 5661

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
All you "raise the capital gains tax now" folks better be careful what you wish for. Do you even realize that a large portion of retirement income is in that category? Here we go....."you want to make granny eat cat food". Because if you continue down this road, you will be taxed at a higher rate when YOU retire.
You obviously don't know about retirement accounts. The money placed in IRAs, 401Ks, Roth IRAs, etc., are tax deferred when contributed but when they are withdrawn they are taxed at the ordinary income rate, not the capital gains rate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-26-2012, 06:56 AM
 
Location: SC
9,101 posts, read 16,449,841 times
Reputation: 3620
Quote:
Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv View Post
Romney is sinking.

Newt is rising.

Newt will get the nomination.

Obama will trounce him.

That's pretty much the way I'm starting to see it.
Newt can't get the nomination. Nancy Pelosi says she "knows something" that would prevent that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2012, 07:04 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,941,962 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by emilybh View Post
Newt can't get the nomination. Nancy Pelosi says she "knows something" that would prevent that.
Well, if I had dirt of that magnitude on Newt, I'd wait until after he got the nomination to spring it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2012, 10:38 AM
 
Location: The Land of Reason
13,221 posts, read 12,314,576 times
Reputation: 3554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katzpur View Post
I think people have a problem with Romney's wealth, period.

Nevertheless, he is far more successful financially than his father ever was. I give him credit for being able to accomplish what he has, even if he didn't start in the mailroom.

It is called having a leagacy, most wealthy people do better than their parents, because their parents paved the way with their influence in government/business and policies
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2012, 10:42 AM
 
Location: The Land of Reason
13,221 posts, read 12,314,576 times
Reputation: 3554
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimMe View Post
Thank goodness Barack and Michelle "Marie Antoinette" Obama are in touch with the common people. That's if you assume the common people are composed of Hollywood elites, Wall Street power brokers and Marxist academicians.

They were not born wealthy that is what he was talking about

Don't be dense!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2012, 11:48 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,450,111 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Well, if I had dirt of that magnitude on Newt, I'd wait until after he got the nomination to spring it.
What she thinks she has would be illegal to disclose if she thinks she's going to bring up one of the eighty-three failed accusations she tried to bring Newt down with. Plus, it's absolutely laughable that Nancy "The Inside Trader" Pelosi thinks she has dirt on someone while she, herself, was using I wider knowledge to profit at the expense of tax payers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2012, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,941,962 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
What she thinks she has would be illegal to disclose if she thinks she's going to bring up one of the eighty-three failed accusations she tried to bring Newt down with. Plus, it's absolutely laughable that Nancy "The Inside Trader" Pelosi thinks she has dirt on someone while she, herself, was using I wider knowledge to profit at the expense of tax payers.
Why would anything not classified as national security be illegal to disclose? What law makes whatever she may have, illegal to disclose?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2012, 12:06 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,941,962 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katzpur
I think people have a problem with Romney's wealth, period.

Nevertheless, he is far more successful financially than his father ever was. I give him credit for being able to accomplish what he has, even if he didn't start in the mailroom.
Romney was born on third base. You make it sound as if he hit a triple on his own.

What is interesting about his wealth is that in the last two years he's earned $43 million without actively being engaged in any business. That is starkly in contrast to the narrative that he's a hard-working job creator. He would have made that money sitting around the pool or skiing in Vale.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2012, 12:18 PM
 
Location: The Land of Reason
13,221 posts, read 12,314,576 times
Reputation: 3554
Quote:
Originally Posted by slo1318 View Post
I was listening to Dave Ramsey today, he was talking about this very subject without naming names. Its such a hollow straw man argument that boils down to jealousy for some, and the transferring of their own belief system for others. When people look at Romney and see a good guy, a decent family man, who has been enormously successful through hard work & determination, but still gives to charities and his church, pays taxes fairly as required and wants to serve his country....they cant believe it. Thats all there is to it.
How about a wealthy man that cares about his family but wants make sure that the money that he has inherited continues to make more money by influencing policy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2012, 12:32 PM
 
Location: Mostly in my head
19,855 posts, read 65,802,767 times
Reputation: 19378
Romney has absolutle nothing in common with me and my financial status. $42 million in 2 years for sitting on his backside? Pluuueeze!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top