Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A 9 year plus war We certainly know how to get things done iin a timely manner
All of this "chasing terrorists" could be done in a covert manner.
Not by dropping bombs hoping we hit one once in a while.
I simply call that "accidental success".
Obama didn't start either war..This isn't a movie..Civilians die in covert ops as well. The issue is not invading countries for no reason.
David Gergen on CNN, about the contraceptive debate: "It sounded like 4 white guys telling women how they are going to control their lives." Could be a problem with women voters in general election.
The 3 stooges + Obama want to embark upon yet another War with Iran. Then, they would all have us go into Syria. Santorum would also invade Lebanon, and Romney said that Pakistan is a threat to the US. Honestly, WHO AREN'T WE GOING TO WAR WITH?!
Ron Paul is the only voice of sanity pointing out that THIS IS WAR we're talking about and PEOPLE WILL DIE! WAR serious business and every single one of these guys is a CHICKENHAWK and NUTCASE FEAR-MONGER!
Our CONSCIENCE should give us pause when engaging in UNJUSTIFIED WARS.
Our CONSTITUTION should keep us from conducting UNLAWFUL WARS.
Our FINANCIAL SENSIBILITIES should stop us from waging UNNECESSARY WARS.
Romney, Santorum, Gingrich, and Obama ignore all 3 reasons to END THESE WARS!!!
Well said, though I think we will be in Syria first, followed by Iran. I totally believe we are funding and equipping the Syrian "opposition" to establish yet another puppet dictator, and have more control around Iran.
Newt won the debate and Santorum got crushed(not sure he even belonged on the stage with the other three). Paul and Romney had their moments but Newt really shined most of the night. Too bad he is Newt and has so much baggage, it would be fun to watch him debate Obama.
I guess you didn't hear Paul say he wouldn't want Iran to have one either.
...and he gave no plan on how to prevent it. He's against sanctions, having bases in the area as a deterrent or direct military intervention. Paul says a lot of cutesy things but never gives details that are practical.
When asked to describe oneself with a single word. . .one should use an ADJECTIVE. "Courage" is NOT an adjective.
Right. He should have said "courageous". Talk about dumbing down.
Have things gotten so bad that we'd elect someone who doesn't even know english grammar well enough that you use adjectives to describe nouns?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We certainly know how to get things done iin a timely manner
