Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The 3 stooges + Obama want to embark upon yet another War with Iran. Then, they would all have us go into Syria. Santorum would also invade Lebanon, and Romney said that Pakistan is a threat to the US. Honestly, WHO AREN'T WE GOING TO WAR WITH?!
Ron Paul is the only voice of sanity pointing out that THIS IS WAR we're talking about and PEOPLE WILL DIE! WAR serious business and every single one of these guys is a CHICKENHAWK and NUTCASE FEAR-MONGER!
Our CONSCIENCE should give us pause when engaging in UNJUSTIFIED WARS.
Our CONSTITUTION should keep us from conducting UNLAWFUL WARS.
Our FINANCIAL SENSIBILITIES should stop us from waging UNNECESSARY WARS.
Romney, Santorum, Gingrich, and Obama ignore all 3 reasons to END THESE WARS!!!
Yeah he did. I thought it was a good question too. It was Romney's opportunity to refute the fact that the biggest misconception about him was that he is a flip flopper (which of course he couldn't do, so that is why he couldn't answer the question). Really only Paul and Gingrich to a degree, answered the question. Santorum and Romney both gave stump speeches.
Ron Paul did a good job using Eisenhower's name in the post debate speech. However, I don't think Ike would want Iran to get a nuke either, so I don't know for sure what he would do. Ron Paul didn't do bad. Romney did well, Newt made a lot of quality points...Santorum didn't do as well.
It is sad but it is war. 700 in three years is a hell of lot better than the million in Iraq for absolutely nothing.
A 9 year plus war We certainly know how to get things done iin a timely manner
All of this "chasing terrorists" could be done in a covert manner.
Not by dropping bombs hoping we hit one once in a while.
I simply call that "accidental success".
David Gergen on CNN, about the contraceptive debate: "It sounded like 4 white guys telling women how they are going to control their lives." Could be a problem with women voters in general election.
Ron Paul did a good job using Eisenhower's name in the post debate speech. However, I don't think Ike would want Iran to get a nuke either, so I don't know for sure what he would do. Ron Paul didn't do bad. Romney did well, Newt made a lot of quality points...Santorum didn't do as well.
I guess you didn't hear Paul say he wouldn't want Iran to have one either.
Ron Paul did a good job using Eisenhower's name in the post debate speech. However, I don't think Ike would want Iran to get a nuke either, so I don't know for sure what he would do. Ron Paul didn't do bad. Romney did well, Newt made a lot of quality points...Santorum didn't do as well.
Iran is building nulcear power plants, NOT weapons.
The moderator asked Willard directly about gas but he decided to give a stump speech to the crowd he bought and paid for.
Willard reminds me of Al Bore, no personality at all, while Newt is full of it, and probably why he does so well in debates. If Paul can't win I'd rather have Newt win over Willard and Santorum. Santorum is aggravating, listening to him rip public schooling while taking money from PA taxpayers to home school his kids in Virginia.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.