Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Any sane people get the feeling they called Romney the winner because the show was only an hour long and they needed a winner now? I mean wtf no Seattle or Spokane votes were in...
This includes results from Western Washington, which we had been waiting for.
I guessed that it was going to be a closer split. The GOP in WA is heavily religious-right and Paul is very popular here. I would have guessed something closer to 30-30-30 and maybe 10 for Newt. This is a strong showing by Mitt.
Any sane people get the feeling they called Romney the winner because the show was only an hour long and they needed a winner now? I mean wtf no Seattle or Spokane votes were in...
Romney is way ahead, Paul will do well in Spokane but not well enough, plus Fox and ABC have also called it.
Everyone enjoy the fraud and vote rigging show? I did...I wish I had my volume remote to mute that son of a female dog King's mouth up...this is exactly why I don't get excited or even expect Paul to win...no Spokane numbers no Seattle numbers yet Romney wins...yeah right sure pal.
They've screwed up on projections before. Remember Florida in 2000? Every news organization called the win, then had to backpedal furiously. Remember Iowa this year?
I do think Mitt's got this one if the pundits are right about Seattle. But it does make it more of an educated guess calling the race before they have the numbers from there. I'll keep a tiny shred of hope that Paul can win it, but I won't be holding my breath.
They've screwed up on projections before. Remember Florida in 2000? Every news organization called the win, then had to backpedal furiously. Remember Iowa this year?
I do think Mitt's got this one if the pundits are right about Seattle. But it does make it more of an educated guess calling the race before they have the numbers from there. I'll keep a tiny shred of hope that Paul can win it, but I won't be holding my breath.
Any sane people get the feeling they called Romney the winner because the show was only an hour long and they needed a winner now? I mean wtf no Seattle or Spokane votes were in...
I don't buy that at all. They stayed up till the early morning hours watching the Iowa race.
Nah nothing fishy going on here...cut the live results show....can't let Paul win on live tv that would destroy the myth of not being electable. I can't believe people are actually falling for this crap. insurmountable lead really? 2k votes is not insurmountable...what a crock of ****.
Nah nothing fishy going on here...cut the live results show....can't let Paul win on live tv that would destroy the myth of not being electable. I can't believe people are actually falling for this crap. insurmountable lead really? 2k votes is not insurmountable...what a crock of ****.
You do realize Fox will have a live show in about an hour and they have also called it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.