U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-16-2012, 08:44 AM
 
Location: PA
5,560 posts, read 4,978,541 times
Reputation: 1945

Advertisements

Rick S and being Christian has nothing to do with getting rid of porn.
Rick S is a CONTROL FREAK, mob rule control freak on which standards come from distorted tales of humanity and the way to live everyone else's lives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-16-2012, 08:50 AM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,908 posts, read 10,081,462 times
Reputation: 7456
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomexico View Post
Really? I don't think so. The more people have learned about Ron Paul - his supposed "base" - they have voted for others in the primary. One example: the Tea Party has abandoned him, almost entirely.

The Tea Party was hijacked by neocons!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 08:55 AM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,908 posts, read 10,081,462 times
Reputation: 7456
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Who appointed you as the arbiter of what consitutes 'sexual morality'? I consider sexual morality to be loyalty in a commited relationship and from I read there was certainly no shortage of cheaters in the era you consider so morally superior to today.



Right, there were no candy stores with back rooms and under the counter 'dirty books, eh? And once again, who are you to judge what's 'filthy'?



Is homophobia now an 'official' standard for judging morality?



Proclaiming something you believe is wrong is wrong for everyone is far worse and unacceptable.

Well said burdell!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 09:07 AM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,908 posts, read 10,081,462 times
Reputation: 7456
Quote:
Originally Posted by california-jewel View Post
Not all of us, sorry but being true, want me to lie, nope. I do watch it, with hubby, a way of things moving a bit faster. Sad nope but true.



And might shock you, my girlfriends who are republicians, also watch cannot ever put everyone in the same catergory, does not work.

Infact we have watch porn parties, nahhhhhhh just sounded good.
I have hot Italian blood, and we are lovers.
I feel any couple or adults have a right to his or her own privacy in the setting of their own home.

As a guy, I don't feel the need to watch porn constantly. I mean, after all, the plots are usually cheesy, with bad dialogue, bad acting, and unrealistic. With that said, every once in awhile, it's nice to watch a film with your significant other to spice things up a bit in the bedroom!

Santorum is nothing more than, as someone said "the Christian Taliban." It's scary that this moron almost won the Republican primary in Ohio! Not that Romney winning was any better, but it's unbelievable that my state, the 7th most populated state in the country still has a huge faction of those here who are a** backwards! The government needs to stay the f*** out of our bedrooms! As others have said....don't like it, don't watch it! Simple!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 09:14 AM
 
2,447 posts, read 2,680,747 times
Reputation: 2203
Red states watch more porn, how convenient. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bgs5A...c8FUAAAAAAAGAA

Last edited by Aganusn; 03-16-2012 at 09:34 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 09:17 AM
 
12,303 posts, read 15,205,734 times
Reputation: 8114
And campaign literature by Romney or Gingrich, later Obama, is hereby defined as Pornography.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 09:17 AM
 
4,749 posts, read 3,610,614 times
Reputation: 3225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogdad View Post
Campaign rhetoric. SCOTUS won't allow it. If you follow their decisions I believe most of the conservative judges have voted against banning adult porn.
This SCOTUS just might allow it (the banning of porn).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 09:23 AM
 
2,490 posts, read 3,748,348 times
Reputation: 2871
I agree with Santorum and with tvdxer.

You guys are all grown adults, you should be able to get by fine without pornography. The fact you guys seem to need to porn to satisfy you shows a lack of self control and maturity.

Not to mention the amount of children who get exposed to it. Earlier and more frequent exposure to sexual content increases sexual activity at a younger age which increases the likelihood of them catching an STD or getting pregnant.

Go Santorum!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 09:25 AM
 
4,749 posts, read 3,610,614 times
Reputation: 3225
Keep 'em comin', Ricky.

As I said, this is the Republican front-runner right now. Mitt has the delegates, but many are uncommitted. Rick Santorum is winning when you take Newt Gingrich out of the picture, and Santorum voters know this, which is why they'll be furious if Newt stays in the race and ruins Santorum's chances, resulting in a brokered convention.

We already know that Ron Paul voters are going to revolt at the GOP convention. But if Romney ends up winning because of spoiler Newt, there would be a second and more devastating revolt that would take place at the convention. The Republican establishment knows that Santorum would be an unmitigated disaster, but the reality is, he's the GOP candidate. He's the base that Karl Rove so often talks about. He's the authentic conservative that republitards pander to and keep talking about as the guy who will deliver a landslide win. So, if they force Romney on the GOP, then the GOP base will be livid. On the other hand, if they pick Rick, the republitards will be sent to a landslide defeat that might damage the party's image well beyond this election.

In short, the republitards are f*cked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2012, 09:26 AM
 
4,749 posts, read 3,610,614 times
Reputation: 3225
Quote:
Originally Posted by 90sman View Post
I agree with Santorum and with tvdxer.

You guys are all grown adults, you should be able to get by fine without pornography. The fact you guys seem to need to porn to satisfy you shows a lack of self control and maturity.

Not to mention the amount of children who get exposed to it. Earlier and more frequent exposure to sexual content increases sexual activity at a younger age.

Go Santorum!
Yeah, and there's something to be said for using one's imagination....I guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top