Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Bruhahahahah You've hit the nail on the head it's a good thing I wasn't drinking anything I would have ruined my keyboard. Priceless post of the day...thanks for a great laugh when I really needed one.
He is a lot like Niedermeyer only much more toxic...so who's gonna take Frothy's horse into the deans office - I'm in - Oh and I'd be in for a major road trip too
Animal House a real classic is near and dear to me for many reasons it was filmed at and around my old stompin' grounds - the UofO and the era is mine also When I get homesick I watch it and have very very fond memories
You guys are all grown adults, you should be able to get by fine without pornography. The fact you guys seem to need to porn to satisfy you shows a lack of self control and maturity.
Not to mention the amount of children who get exposed to it. Earlier and more frequent exposure to sexual content increases sexual activity at a younger age which increases the likelihood of them catching an STD or getting pregnant.
Go Santorum!
What about adults wanting to watch it just because they enjoy it? I don't see why as an adult I should not watch it in privacy just because Ricky thinks its nasty and disgusting.
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,080,865 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReturningWest
Bruhahahahah You've hit the nail on the head it's a good thing I wasn't drinking anything I would have ruined my keyboard. Priceless post of the day...thanks for a great laugh when I really needed one.
He is a lot like Niedermeyer only much more toxic...so who's gonna take Frothy's horse into the deans office - I'm in - Oh and I'd be in for a major road trip too
Animal House a real classic is near and dear to me for many reasons it was filmed at and around my old stompin' grounds - the UofO and the era is mine also When I get homesick I watch it and have very very fond memories
I couldn't give yah any reps sorry
....He is Niedermeyer made over...same smarmy,goofy knows everthing,but really knows nothing type....around here we say "his driveway doesn't go all the way out to the road" if ya know what I mean
I just can't get over the hypocrisy of people who want the government to regulate the behavior of real people, but do not want the government to have any regulation of corporations who are defined as "people".
What if GE wants to look porn? To deny GE the ability to look at porn is to punish a "job creator", since corporations looking at porn create jobs in the porn industry. If you follow the thinking of Santorum and his ilk, that's precisely the irrational logic their ideas lead to.
What about adults wanting to watch it just because they enjoy it? I don't see why as an adult I should not watch it in privacy just because Ricky thinks its nasty and disgusting.
I do not think for an instant that Santorum will be able to ban it outright. This virus has become simply too infused into our culture, as the posts here demonstrate. Those who refuse to give this habit up will find comfort in this. And plus, even banning it would not guarantee its unavailability - millions of perverts, cell phone video cameras and peer-to-peer networks should take care of that. After all, isn't that where porn is headed? Amateur production?
What Santorum could POSSIBLY do is put additional clamps on the industry, and possibly make it more difficult for minors to access, at least those minors whose parents are responsible enough to have a filter on their internet. What I envision is an Australian-style national voluntary internet filter. Those who opt into it could receive a (relatively) clean internet connection; but individuals would also be free to opt out of it.
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,080,865 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by GWhopper
I just can't get over the hypocrisy of people who want the government to regulate the behavior of real people, but do not want the government to have any regulation of corporations who are defined as "people".
What if GE wants to look porn? To deny GE the ability to look at porn is to punish a "job creator", since corporations looking at porn create jobs in the porn industry. If you follow the thinking of Santorum and his ilk, that's precisely the irrational logic their ideas lead to.
+1
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Priceless post of the day...thanks for a great laugh when I really needed one.
When I get homesick I watch it and have very very fond memories
