Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
With the WaPo article outlining Mittens' gay bashing and bullying past is it time for the GOP to look elsewhere?
If Mittens treated people like this on his way up, hurting people that he crossed paths with, is it reasonable to assume there will be more disgusting stories coming out? When you hurt people, they talk.
Last edited by buzzards27; 05-11-2012 at 07:25 AM..
With the WaPo article outlining Mittens' gay bashing and bullying past is it time for the GOP to look elsewhere?
If Mittens treated people like this on his way up, hurting people that he crossed paths with, is it reasonable to assume there will be mote stories coming out? When you hurt people, they talk.
With the WaPo article outlining Mittens' gay bashing and bullying past is it time for the GOP to look elsewhere?
If Mittens treated people like this on his way up, hurting people that he crossed paths with, is it reasonable to assume there will be mote stories coming out? When you hurt people, they talk.
I don't think that story will even be necessary. I think the die has been cast. The RNC rules state that no delegates are bound and Ron Paul is obviously way more popular than Romney. Paul will end up with more delegates in August than Romney and even if he doesn't, Romney won't have enough to take the nomination and we'll let the delegates vote their conscience to determine who the nominee will be.
On the one hand, I think Romney is despicable and wish the Republican party had the balls to choose Paul. However, I don't think he's quite the puppet they're looking for (as Grover Norquist said, someone who can just sign a bill). So I doubt TPTB in the Republican party would allow Ron Paul to be the nominee.
I am also not comfortable with a late nomination because there wouldn't be time for Paul to be fully vetted before the election. I think the American people need to find out a lot more about Ron Paul.
On the one hand, I think Romney is despicable and wish the Republican party had the balls to choose Paul. However, I don't think he's quite the puppet they're looking for (as Grover Norquist said, someone who can just sign a bill). So I doubt TPTB in the Republican party would allow Ron Paul to be the nominee.
I am also not comfortable with a late nomination because there wouldn't be time for Paul to be fully vetted before the election. I think the American people need to find out a lot more about Ron Paul.
I wouldn't worry about it. Most people will vote for their own party. If they are Republicans, they will vote for anyone with an R on it.
If you have pay attention to 2008, Obama won because he got majority of college vote from college students. People want real change. Guess who got all the student's attention?
The only republican candidate that made any sense and had a realistic plan for America was sabotaged by the news media. If it were not for the internet most of us would have never heard of Ron Paul.
Welcome to American. The best government money can buy.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
