Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-28-2012, 07:31 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,297,960 times
Reputation: 3122

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by enemy country View Post
The GOP for reasons I'd rather not post always win the Vet vote. Not this vet though. Unless romney can take MI or OH or WI he can have VA and NC and still lose.
Mitt Romney problem is basically this; it's easier for President Obama to hold states like Ohio, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin among others than it is for Mitt to take them. It takes more time, effort and money to come from behind in the game of politics.

As long as the Democrats control states like California, New York, Illinois and others they have built in advantage in terms of electoral votes. The only state the Republicans firmly control with a high number of electoral votes is Texas. Then they have built around that with small populations states in the Rocky Mountains and the South. Now granted Mitt Romney may have some success in terms of taking North Carolina or Florida but it's just not going to be enough to get him to 270. His personality and his policies limit his appeal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-28-2012, 07:39 AM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,949,402 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzyTallGuy View Post
Mitt Romney problem is basically this; it's easier for President Obama to hold states like Ohio, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin among others than it is for Mitt to take them. It takes more time, effort and money to come from behind in the game of politics.

As long as the Democrats control states like California, New York, Illinois and others they have built in advantage in terms of electoral votes. The only state the Republicans firmly control with a high number of electoral votes is Texas. Then they have built around that with small populations states in the Rocky Mountains and the South. Now granted Mitt Romney may have some success in terms of taking North Carolina or Florida but it's just not going to be enough to get him to 270. His personality and his policies limit his appeal.
The only problem with your scenario is that you ignore the fact that Oblama's first failed term limits his appeal far more than Mitt's personality (which is just fine) or his policies (which cannot possibly be worse than Oblama's).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2012, 07:43 AM
 
Location: The Golden State, USA
957 posts, read 757,724 times
Reputation: 1443
I'm a Veteran, but not a mouth breathing ditto head, so I proudly support Barack Obama. Mittens has aligned himself with the same crowd who brought us the ill advised invasion of Iraq. He appears to be a chicken hawk, who when given the opportunity to serve our country, bailed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2012, 07:46 AM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,537,374 times
Reputation: 18814
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
It could be because Barack Obama absolutely sucks and is hands down the worst POTUS of all time.
Since Obama has done more for vets than the previous Repubican president, your statement doesn't hold ground.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2012, 07:50 AM
 
Location: San Diego
5,319 posts, read 8,981,479 times
Reputation: 3396
The majority of the military always votes for Republicans. This is nothing new.

Why?

Because Republicans are war mongers, so they keep the military actively employed.

Democrats are mostly about solving foreign matters through peaceful solutions.

Republicans immediately think of war.

Bush is the perfect example of this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2012, 07:52 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,072 posts, read 51,199,205 times
Reputation: 28313
I'm in the minority on this one. Obama! Being a vet who understands what it is like, I want the guy who is least likely to start another idiotic war like Vietnam or Iraq. Obama is the better choice of the two, though Paul has the best policy in that regard. I also don't like the fact that Mitt used his religion to avoid service.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2012, 07:58 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,297,960 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trace21230 View Post
The only problem with your scenario is that you ignore the fact that Oblama's first failed term limits his appeal far more than Mitt's personality (which is just fine) or his policies (which cannot possibly be worse than Oblama's).
Sorry but your entitled to your opinion but there simply aren't enough people that agree with you.

Mitt Romney has a ceiling and that ceiling is outside of older White males he's not really that popular. The more he panders to that group the more he alienates everybody else.

In Presidential Election, Age Is a Factor Only Among Whites



Also even amongst the Republican faithful there is far less enthusiasm for Mitt Romney than the Democrats have for President Obama.

Dems Happier With Obama Than Republicans Are With Romney



Basically over one-third of Republicans are NOT HAPPY with Mitt as the nominee.



Now compare that to the overwhelming support President Barack Obama has in the Democratic Party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2012, 08:06 AM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,453,455 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzyTallGuy View Post
And he's still going to lose the election.
You and the other Obama lovers have the most pathetic sense of entitlement. A majority of Americans do not approve of the job Obama is doing and a majority of Americans do not feel he deserves to be re-elected. I know that's hard for you all to grasp. Sure, he may manage to get re-elected but it's certainly not for certain. No president with approval ratings as low as his has ever been re-elected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2012, 08:16 AM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,453,455 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzyTallGuy View Post
Sorry but your entitled to your opinion but there simply aren't enough people that agree with you.
Yes, there are. Obama's approval remains below 50% in the vast majority of polling - both nationally and in states like Ohio, Virginia, Florida, and even Pennsylvania.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzyTallGuy View Post
Mitt Romney has a ceiling and that ceiling is outside of older White males he's not really that popular. The more he panders to that group the more he alienates everybody else.

In Presidential Election, Age Is a Factor Only Among Whites
Incumbents basically have a ceiling of their approval rating - or actually generally a few points below their approval rating - when looking at the percentage of the vote they receive. And that's among those who actually vote. Republicans/Republican-leaning independents are more likely to vote. (Even in 2004, with a strong anti-war sentiment and relatively high turnout among Democrats/Democratic-leaning independents, Bush's approval was only about 51% in most polling around the time of the election but 53% according to exit polls of voters. He got only about 51% of the vote...he underperformed his approval as most incumbents do.)

So Obama is the one with more of a ceiling. His approval is stuck at 47%-48% - likely closer to 45%-46% among those who will actually vote. Can it come up? Sure. Is it likely to come up significantly before the election? Probably not. It's just as likely to go down. It all depends on how the economy does and on the campaign. And before you start with the demographic bullsh*t...his approval is basically around what you would expect his percentage of the vote to be among blacks and Hispanics (and people who identify as "liberal"). As far as the campaign, the Romney campaign + the Super PAC's supporting him will likely have significantly more money than the Obama campaign + the Super PAC's supporting him. If this is the case, which is very, very likely, it will be the first time an incumbent president has actually had a disadvantage as far as campaign funding.

Back to demographics - maybe you should read the graphs you post. Romney leads even among 18-29 year old whites. And, given that he leads by 10 or more in every age group of whites 30 or older, I'm sure that he leads with white women in each one of these groups as well. So, while Romney may have a problem with minorities, he certainly does not have a problem with young and middle-aged white men or with white women. Obama has problems with these groups.

More to counteract the idea that "no one" likes Romney his favorability per Gallup is 50% with his unfavorability at 41%. That means his net favorability is +9%. Obama's favorability is 52%, while his unfavorability is 46%, making his net favorability +6%. So Romney's net favorability is higher than Obama's.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/154703/Ro...le-Rating.aspx

Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzyTallGuy View Post
Basically over one-third of Republicans are NOT HAPPY with Mitt as the nominee.
In 2008, a lot of Hillary suppoters weren't happy with Obama as the nominee. This means nothing...in May. Furthermore, even if they're not happy with him, they will turn out to vote Obama out in large numbers. The same Republicans who dislike Romney the most HATE Obama.

Last edited by afoigrokerkok; 05-28-2012 at 08:53 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2012, 09:13 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,297,960 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
You and the other Obama lovers have the most pathetic sense of entitlement. A majority of Americans do not approve of the job Obama is doing and a majority of Americans do not feel he deserves to be re-elected. I know that's hard for you all to grasp. Sure, he may manage to get re-elected but it's certainly not for certain. No president with approval ratings as low as his has ever been re-elected.
You know absolutely nothing about me. Sorry bust your bubble but I joined the Army out of high school worked my way through college and invested my money and then continued my education.

Save you 'entitlement' B.S. for somebody else.

These are George W. Bush job approval ratings for each year he held office.

Bush Job Approval at 28%, Lowest of His Administration

Quote:
PRINCETON, NJ -- President George W. Bush's job approval rating has dropped to 28%, the lowest of his administration. Bush's approval is lower than that of any president since World War II, with the exceptions of Jimmy Carter (who had a low point of 28% in 1979), and Richard Nixon and Harry Truman, who suffered ratings in the low- to mid-20% range in the last years of their administrations.


Currently President Obama is around 49% in his fourth year. He's really not that far from where George W. Bush was when he got re-elected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:37 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top