Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
wow it is interesting when the greatest con is what she wears... some how I can envision the speaker in a polyester moo-moo. Come to the party in your Christian Dior then tell me she dresses poorly, it would have more merit. Then I would simply say... So... I really don't give a rats ass what she wears. I guess I would rather look at her stand on issues. She is against the war.. so am I, She is pro-choice, she supports fiscal responsability and we saw it under her husband, there are so many topics she can be rated on, energy, foreign relations, civil rights, constitutional challenges,the environment, free trade. and so on.
I suggest if we as voters spend the time educating ourselves on the positions of the candidates it will be less a popularity contest and more what is good for the country.
May I suggest OnTheIssues.org - Candidates on the Issues
for an education as to where they all stand. Take some of the tests that match the way you believe to the candidates you may find who you support isnt the best in your own opinion. Oh and be sure to vote. If you don't then you have nothing valid to say.
wow it is interesting when the greatest con is what she wears... some how I can envision the speaker in a polyester moo-moo. Come to the party in your Christian Dior then tell me she dresses poorly, it would have more merit. Then I would simply say... So... I really don't give a rats ass what she wears. I guess I would rather look at her stand on issues. She is against the war.. so am I, She is pro-choice, she supports fiscal responsability and we saw it under her husband, there are so many topics she can be rated on, energy, foreign relations, civil rights, constitutional challenges,the environment, free trade. and so on.
I suggest if we as voters spend the time educating ourselves on the positions of the candidates it will be less a popularity contest and more what is good for the country.
May I suggest OnTheIssues.org - Candidates on the Issues
for an education as to where they all stand. Take some of the tests that match the way you believe to the candidates you may find who you support isnt the best in your own opinion. Oh and be sure to vote. If you don't then you have nothing valid to say.
Remember Bill said he was against NAFTA? It probably got him a lot of union votes because that is where he stood on the issue. I find it very difficult to trust 'How they stand on the issues'
insincere. phony. will say and be whatever she thinks will get her elected.
this is what i see from all the candidates, especially hillary: after Barrack Obama's success, everyone now is running on Barrack Obama's platform. all of the sudden everybody's talking about "change". everybody is going to be a "uniter". say what you will about Obama - he is the only candidate who hasn't changed their platform.
and hillary, i'm sure, will re-invent herself at least a couple more times before this is over. "i talked to you, New Hampshire. and in talking to you, i found my voice!" come on! really? she's 60 and just found her voice?!? and is that not an admission that up until she "found her voice" she has been as phony and calculating as everyone says?
insincere. phony. will say and be whatever she thinks will get her elected.
this is what i see from all the candidates, especially hillary: after Barrack Obama's success, everyone now is running on Barrack Obama's platform. all of the sudden everybody's talking about "change". everybody is going to be a "uniter". say what you will about Obama - he is the only candidate who hasn't changed their platform.
and hillary, i'm sure, will re-invent herself at least a couple more times before this is over. "i talked to you, New Hampshire. and in talking to you, i found my voice!" come on! really? she's 60 and just found her voice?!? and is that not an admission that up until she "found her voice" she has been as phony and calculating as everyone says?
yeah, that voice thing, that was an Exorcist moment if I ever saw one, "hey, Dimmy, this is your Mother"...."No Im the Devil, your mother is in here, would you like to leave a message, Ill see that she gets it"... I was waiting for the records to start flying around the stage, bodies pivoting off the podiums, lol...
The public hasn't had as much of a history of this with the others. Bush has stuck steadfastly to most of his assinine ideas. No. She waffles more than anyone I have seen on issues and on personality. They all waffle, but she takes the cake. Yeah, Really! She is the consistent in one area: Being a chameleon.
insincere. phony. will say and be whatever she thinks will get her elected.
this is what i see from all the candidates, especially hillary: after Barrack Obama's success, everyone now is running on Barrack Obama's platform. all of the sudden everybody's talking about "change". everybody is going to be a "uniter". say what you will about Obama - he is the only candidate who hasn't changed their platform.
and hillary, i'm sure, will re-invent herself at least a couple more times before this is over. "i talked to you, New Hampshire. and in talking to you, i found my voice!" come on! really? she's 60 and just found her voice?!? and is that not an admission that up until she "found her voice" she has been as phony and calculating as everyone says?
"Change" isn't a platform. It's a slogan that takes the place of having to answer hard questions. Everyone votes for "change" during an election. It's a given.
The "Uniter" slogan was stolen from George Dubya Bush.
She is "old"...and I'm not talking physically. The world has changed a lot the past few years. We don't want or need her negativity. Hillary is politics as usual, politics that haven't worked. I don't trust her. I don't respect her. Her campaign is negative. This kind of campaigning will get her results (lies and playing on peoples fears can get you what you want) but it is the same old "ruling class" mentality and a lot of people are sick of it and won't vote for it.
She is "old"...and I'm not talking physically. The world has changed a lot the past few years. We don't want or need her negativity. Hillary is politics as usual, politics that haven't worked. I don't trust her. I don't respect her. Her campaign is negative. This kind of campaigning will get her results (lies and playing on peoples fears can get you what you want) but it is the same old "ruling class" mentality and a lot of people are sick of it and won't vote for it.
How do you know your candidate ISN'T "politics as usual?"
Cause he says so? What political record can be pointed to that shows things aren't "politics as usual?"
Besides Ron Paul, I don't see anyone who strikes me as an "anti-establishment" candidate. Unless you count "not voting" in the Senate as a Senator as a Revolutionary Act.
This pretty much sums it up for me too. She is hell-bent on getting what she wants and will stop at almost nothing to get it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.