Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Maybe it's time for Obama to run on his record and ALL the accomplishments his administration has amassed, and quit sending his parrots to spread lies and innuendos.
Keep harping on Romney's tax returns. It ain't working, and Romney is addressing the real problems that face this nation. True Americans recognize the REAL problems facing this nation, and Romney's tax returns are not a major issue. It's the economy, STUPID!!!
Romney's tax returns have no bearing on the problems which face this nation. The presumed furor regarding Romney's tax returns are this administration's attempt to engage the government controlled media in chasing down little rabbits while this nation withers on the financial vine.
You can jump up and down all you want fact remains Romney does'nt want to come clean with his finances, its a story thats going to be a thorn in his side right up till election day.He has the ability to end the speculation anytime he wants,why doesnt he?
As for Obamas record? = Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far) » Obama's Achievements Center
Whats Romney's record? oh yeah he worked at Bain for 25yrs and he's been telling us he's going fix the economy but he never quite gets to the point where he tells us how he's going to fix the economy,you people gotta trust me.
As for Obama knowing about Romney's financial records?Maybe he does maybe he doesnt but this is big time politics its mean and nasty so if Obama knew Romney's records were clean he's not about to come out and defend the guy..
Can you imagine the outrage? The term "uppity" comes to mind.
Seriously, the same people who had a field day when then-Candidate Obama made a reference to "arugula," calling him an "elitist," have no problems with a candidate who takes a $77,000 tax deduction on a dancing horse, has a car elevator in his house, says $400,000 is "not much," and who has money stashed in off-shore accounts.
Go figure.
I love it when libs hear a foolish talking point and don't bother vetting it.
The horse deduction was $49.
Oopsie on you!
Morons who think Mitt is hiding something need to report it to the IRS. IRS pays big bucks for catching tax thieves.
I think it is entirely possible that one of the things he doesn't want us to know is just when he really separated from Bain.
As well as where he really lived when he was running for governor of Massachusetts.
And business associations.
And tax amnesty.
The possibilities are endless and will only be resolved upon his releasing the returns.
No doubt he worked at bain but did he do anything there other than be a management bigshot who may have spent most of the time at the country club while junior members did all the work, he aint telling us about that either so we are left to speculate yet again.
He's hiding his contempt for the political slimeballs who inhabit the Democrat party, with its William Jeffersons, its Jim McGreeveys and its John Corzines -- not to mention the little polliwogs who infest this forum with their hatred and lies; experts on political chicanery, they impute the same motivations to everyone else.
Dream on there Lex. Unemployment went up to 8.3% and it looks as though the US is heading into recession again.
The liberal strategy of trying to "change the subject" away from the economy is not working. THE MOST IMPORTANT issue for voters is the economy. They do not care about Mitt's horse or Ann's shirt. They care about jobs, their incomes, and their children's future.
Obama looks more and more ridiculous to rational voters (liberals, of course, excluded) as he has failed miserably on the economy and cannot run on his record. What president has ever conducted such a warped, weird campaign, in which he simply launches personal attacks against his opponant, in the absence of having any accomplishments to tout in his campaign? It is really pathetic.
It looks more and more not only like a Romney win, but a potential landslide victory.
Dream on? Independent voters want to know if this man who claims he can fix the economy is on the level. And why shouldn't they? Look what happened not too long ago.
The subject absolutely should be Romney's record. He isn't running for Mayor of Wasilla. He's running for president.
And let's be honest. Making Romney the subject is working. Rational people understand that almost nobody has the advantages Romney has had.
Dream on? Independent voters want to know if this man who claims he can fix the economy is on the level. And why shouldn't they? Look what happened not too long ago.
And what might that be? The invention of the light bulb? The invasion of Sicily? The Beatles breakup? Jeez. A little specificity, please.
Quote:
The subject absolutely should be Romney's record. He isn't running for Mayor of Wasilla. He's running for president.
Isn't there another guy running? How about HIS record? On closing Guanatamo, getting out of Afghanistan, eliminating the Patriot Act, and rescuing the economy, for example?
On a scale of 1 to 10, I give Romney's taxes a 1.5. Now let's talk about civil liberties, the war, and the economy. You know, little pipsqueak details like that...
Great link....that should keep people busy for a while
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The term "uppity" comes to mind.
