Suppose Romney..................................

[cuebald]

Originally Posted by hawkeye2009

Let's say that Romney, in his first term-

1. cut unemployment to 5.5% or below

2. personal incomes of Americans rose

3. personal savings of Americans rose

4. orchestrated a decline in federal spending

5. improved US exports

6. stabilized the dollar

7. housing market improved




Would any liberal vote for him for a second term? If not, why not?

Not unless UHC, government recognized gay marriage, and no contest to women's choice on abortions comes with the package.

Life is not about money. That is why I will never vote for a Romney/Ryan ticket. They both love money far too much to have any concern with the welfare of America and its citizens.

[SoCalbound12]

Originally Posted by hawkeye2009

Let's say that Romney, in his first term-

1. cut unemployment to 5.5% or below

2. personal incomes of Americans rose

3. personal savings of Americans rose

4. orchestrated a decline in federal spending

5. improved US exports

6. stabilized the dollar

7. housing market improved




Would any liberal vote for him for a second term? If not, why not?

The President should not have any direct or really indirect control over #'s 1-3 and #7. People have this idea of an imperial Presidency that can do all, but really the President shouldn't have this much power.

[nmnita]

Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale

Why would anyone believe that any president has that much power?

well Obama thought he could do anything....