Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-30-2012, 04:23 PM
 
Location: Riverside
4,088 posts, read 4,388,038 times
Reputation: 3092

Advertisements

A three-judge Federal Court panel has struck down Texas' Voter ID law, say in it is discriminatory within the meaning of the Voting Rights Act of 1964:

http://www.google.com/url?url=http:/...c2l5tltAKz32Kw

The panel said, if enacted, the Texas law would disenfranchise 13% of eligible black voters, and 78% of eligible Latino voters. Those are the percentiles believed to lack an acceptable ID under the law (the article does not say what percentage of white/Non-Hispanic voters also lack ID, but obviously, they would be affected too)

One factor in the decision, was, due to the scarcity of government resources in many counties in libertarian Texas, voters would be required in some cases, to travel hundreds of miles to obtain state-issued ID. Since many of these voters do not drive, or evn own a vehicle, that would be an undue burden, interfering with their right to vote.

The case will no doubt wind up before SCOTUS, but I don't know if it can get there in time to effect this election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-30-2012, 06:00 PM
 
Location: #
9,598 posts, read 16,566,362 times
Reputation: 6324
SCOTUS will likely uphold it. Texas is on the list of states that have to get permission due to previous discrimination. Of course, not one politician in Texas will ever admit this while they cry that "Other states do the same thing and it was passed."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2012, 06:37 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,771,097 times
Reputation: 6856
The Republican Party clearly can not be trusted with protecting the voting rights of Americans. Their talk about freedom and liberty is complete crap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2012, 09:31 PM
 
468 posts, read 583,188 times
Reputation: 1123
So let me get this straight to require PHOTO ID to verify "eligibility status" of right to vote would "dis-enfranchise" ONLY minorities???
The government has SPY cameras on peoples faces where ever they go BUT to prove that you are eligible to vote via a photo, the government does not want to see "the face."

Give those judges a DOLE TEST. ASAP.

What's the name of these judges? they need to be voted out or thrown of the bench. They should get the DARWIN award of the year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top