Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What is your view on Obama, the Communist?
I'm a communist. I knew about his communist ties and still support him. 8 26.67%
I'm not a communist, but I still support Obama, despite this information. 5 16.67%
I wasn't aware of this. I supported Obama, but now may reconsider. 0 0%
I'm not a Communist. I knew of his Communist ties and his upbringing. I never supported him. 17 56.67%
I'm not a Communist. I didn't know of much of this information. This makes me dislike him more. 0 0%
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-30-2012, 09:58 AM
 
441 posts, read 501,237 times
Reputation: 290

Advertisements

I wanted to vote in the poll, but there wasn't a box I could check marked "OP is a paranoid whackjob".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-30-2012, 10:07 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,947,200 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by ObserverNY View Post
A right-leaning centrist??? You have got to be kidding me!

Specific realms:

1. General Motors - Obama's use of OUR taxdollars to "save" GM's Auto Workers Union at the expense of shareholders and investors, making us all part-owners of the company.

2. Obamacare - forcing taxation upon individuals to buy insurance or be fined so that "everyone" can have health care

3. 2009 ARRA - using OUR taxdollars to pay for bankrupt green energy companies as well as educational "programs" which have never been vetted or proven successful but which promote Obama's socialist agenda.

I think that's about $3.5 Trillion worth of socialistic "ownership of goods".
thanks for doing my homework for me. Because my point is made if that's the best you've got. None of those things are radical or without precedent.

The government saved Chrysler in the Carter and Reagan area.
ObamaCare was a Republican idea in the 1990s and the mandate was a Heritage Foundation idea supported by Newt Gingrich.
We currently subsidize oil companies and have been doing so for many years. Are you suggesting it's not communist to support oil companies but when it has to do with renewable energy it turns into communism? Your point is silly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2012, 10:51 AM
 
Location: On the border of off the grid
3,179 posts, read 3,165,647 times
Reputation: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
thanks for doing my homework for me. Because my point is made if that's the best you've got. None of those things are radical or without precedent.

The government saved Chrysler in the Carter and Reagan area.
ObamaCare was a Republican idea in the 1990s and the mandate was a Heritage Foundation idea supported by Newt Gingrich.
We currently subsidize oil companies and have been doing so for many years. Are you suggesting it's not communist to support oil companies but when it has to do with renewable energy it turns into communism? Your point is silly.
Reagan had NOTHING to do with the Chrysler bailout - that was pure Carter, previously the worst Democratic President before Obama. And let's take a look at the details - while Congress passed the bill, not only was it for only $1.5B, it was stipulated that Chrysler had to obtain PRIVATE financing and that .gov was merely a co-signer: What Was The Chrysler Bailout? - Political History: The Chrysler Bail Out Compare that with $50.7B to GM, of which American taxpayers will probably never get back over $25B! General Motors | Eye on the Bailout | ProPublica

Boy, you sure do want to try and blame Republicans for Obama's socialist agenda, don't you? Obamacare was shoved through on a completely partisan basis. The ONLY reason it has stood as Constitutional is because for some unexplained reason, Justice Roberts ruled it a TAX.

What do oil company subsidies have to do with the 2009 Porkulus bill? Apples and oranges. Go do more homework.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2012, 10:53 AM
 
Location: On the border of off the grid
3,179 posts, read 3,165,647 times
Reputation: 863
Socialism is nothing more than Communism-Lite.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2012, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Tampa (by way of Omaha)
14,561 posts, read 23,065,107 times
Reputation: 10356
Quote:
"The notion that Barack Obama is a socialist ranks among the greatest fairy tales in American society — right up there with the Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, and the idea that if you work hard enough your children will live a better life than you," Socialist Party spokeswoman Lynn Lomibao said in an email. "Socialists know what Obama is: another corporate-funded politician placed in the White House to protect the wealth and status of the 1 percent."
Socialists: Obama's not one of us - POLITICO.com

Snicker.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2012, 11:33 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,947,200 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by ObserverNY View Post
Reagan had NOTHING to do with the Chrysler bailout - that was pure Carter, previously the worst Democratic President before Obama. And let's take a look at the details - while Congress passed the bill, not only was it for only $1.5B, it was stipulated that Chrysler had to obtain PRIVATE financing and that .gov was merely a co-signer: What Was The Chrysler Bailout? - Political History: The Chrysler Bail Out Compare that with $50.7B to GM, of which American taxpayers will probably never get back over $25B! General Motors | Eye on the Bailout | ProPublica

Boy, you sure do want to try and blame Republicans for Obama's socialist agenda, don't you? Obamacare was shoved through on a completely partisan basis. The ONLY reason it has stood as Constitutional is because for some unexplained reason, Justice Roberts ruled it a TAX.

What do oil company subsidies have to do with the 2009 Porkulus bill? Apples and oranges. Go do more homework.
So, Carter was a Communist too?

It doesn't matter how the ACA was passed. What is relevant to this discussion is its origins, which was the Heritage Foundation and its support was firmly Republicans. So, unless you are claiming that Republicans in the 1990s were communists, your argument has no merit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2012, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,218 posts, read 22,361,490 times
Reputation: 23853
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
Communism is not what is threatening the USA...Plutocracy is.
Uh, oh....
Now you're confusing this thread with another $4 word they don't know anything about!
But, of course, you're right on the mark. America is never going to be a Communist country, but we are on the close to of becoming a post-Communist Russia, and getting closer every day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2012, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,218 posts, read 22,361,490 times
Reputation: 23853
Quote:
Originally Posted by eRayP View Post
Although the Fabian Socialists, like the Marxist Socialists, have always attempted to present themselves as the bitter opponents of the "wealthy capitalists", the truth is that both groups were helped decisively in their activities at critical periods in their history by powerful financial groups.



Roosevelt, an ex-international banker of wide experience and former attorney for international bankers had considerable wealth. It did not prevent him from enthusiastically accepting the advice and support of the Fabian Socialists.

President John Kennedy, Roosevelt's spiritual successor, did not find his wealth a barrier to the acceptance of the advice he received from Fabian Socialist advisers. Kennedy was a product of Harvard University, a hot-bed of Fabian Socialism. Obama is a graduate of Columbia University and Harvard Law School.
Roosevelt practiced law for a whopping 3 years before he won his first election at age 28. While he did come from a wealthy family, a beginning lawyer at 25 is not much more than a law clerk, especially back in those days. He didn't have 'wide experience' at all. Once he won his first state senate race, he was a politician for the rest of his life. After speaking for Woodrow Wilson in the Democratic convention of 1912, Wilson appointed him Undersecretary of the Navy.

If you're getting so much wrong about his beginnings, how much of the rest have you misunderstood afterward?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2012, 12:00 PM
 
Location: On the border of off the grid
3,179 posts, read 3,165,647 times
Reputation: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
So, Carter was a Communist too?
Communist-Lite. Yep, now you're getting it.

Quote:
It doesn't matter how the ACA was passed. What is relevant to this discussion is its origins, which was the Heritage Foundation and its support was firmly Republicans. So, unless you are claiming that Republicans in the 1990s were communists, your argument has no merit.
Of COURSE it matters how Obamadoesn'tCare was passed! It wasn't bi-partisan, 65% of the American people were strongly opposed, nobody read the 2700 page monstrosity and tyrant Nancy Piglosi couldn't tell the American people 1/2700th of what is even in the bill! Obamadoesn'tCare is TYRANNY and TYRANNY is the communist/Marxist's ruling meme of choice! Your attribution of a mention of an individual mandate back in the 1990's by the Heritage Foundation which was never supported or brought to the floor during the Hilarycare battle, is irrelevant, an erroneous attribution to the GOP, and a red herring to this discussion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2012, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,218 posts, read 22,361,490 times
Reputation: 23853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sound of Reason View Post
Most socialists and communists don't identify with the label, for it tars their image in public, considering the negatives of socialism.

I'd say most democrats are true socialists.
Okay. Sez you. Are you the great arbiter of all things? Nope. That's just one guy's opinion. Nothing more.
I could say the Teabaggers are all true fascists, but I won't. That would be just as stupid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top