Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What do you think?
Santorum 2016 20 50.00%
Someone else 20 50.00%
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-01-2012, 08:58 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,929,248 times
Reputation: 7752

Advertisements

The Teaparty has scared away all the reasonable choices. All that is left is loonies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-01-2012, 09:25 PM
F40
 
Location: 85379^85268
826 posts, read 857,102 times
Reputation: 404
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gal from the South View Post
I wonder if OBLAMER will be arrogant enough to run in 2016 when he loses this time.


I am wondering if mittens has the gall to run again in 2016 after he loses again, maybe three times is the charm
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2012, 10:43 PM
 
24,396 posts, read 26,932,004 times
Reputation: 19962
ahahahaha if Romney loses it will be because the gop has moved too far right, so if you pick an even further extremist you'll have no chance. romney should stick with his positions when he ran for governor and he would probably win but the new gop scares away any sane educated person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2012, 11:27 PM
 
Location: Charlotte, NC (in my mind)
7,943 posts, read 17,244,959 times
Reputation: 4686
Liberals want Santorum because he is unelectable and gives the GOP a black eye every time he speaks. The GOP's image problem this election cycle with young people concerning social issues can partially be blamed on Santorum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2012, 05:11 AM
 
Location: Orlando
8,276 posts, read 12,854,528 times
Reputation: 4142
I expect they are so wanting to run Rubio... not sure what they have on him but they want this twit to run.

Some suggest Rand Paul ... tea anyone?

The field this year showed clearly what a poor line up they offer.


Not sure who will make it on the left... Hillary? will she want to try again?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2012, 05:57 AM
 
7,214 posts, read 9,390,397 times
Reputation: 7803
Another great option would be Todd Akin if he manages to win a senate seat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2012, 06:09 AM
 
Location: in a cabin overlooking the mountains
3,078 posts, read 4,373,819 times
Reputation: 2276
I've come to the conclusion that the right wing propaganda machine does NOT want a GOP or TP candidate to win. As long as there is a Dem in office, O'Reilly, Limbaugh etc can continue to scream that the sky is falling and make huge money selling their books. The minute one of their guys gets into office and doesn't do any better, their sales will go down.

Last edited by FrugalYankee; 10-02-2012 at 07:13 AM.. Reason: typo - *huge* not *hugs*!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2012, 07:11 AM
 
2,042 posts, read 2,903,095 times
Reputation: 1546
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrugalYankee View Post
I've come to the conclusion that the right wing propaganda machine does NOT want a GOP or TP candidate to win. As long as there is a Dem in office, O'Reilly, Limbaugh etc can continue to scream that the sky is falling and make hugs money selling their books. The minute one of their guys gets into office and doesn't do any better, their sales will go down.
Wow. Interesting theory. I think it has some teeth
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2012, 07:20 AM
 
Location: West Egg
2,160 posts, read 1,954,197 times
Reputation: 1297
Should they? No.

But they probably will.

In open elections, the GOP almost always nominates the "guy who came in second last time". Like Romney. And McCain. And Dole. And GHW Bush. And Reagan. Such nominees have experience running (yes, there are many lessons to be learned running and failing), they have established campaign contacts and extensive political and donor networks they can easily revive four or eight years after their first run.

But no one every believes it. In 2004, everyone sneered at the idea that McCain would be the 2008 nominee. Ditto in 2008, re Romney in 2012.

Most people just never learn to see the patterns in history, and they can't distinguish between trends that happen and what they want to happen.

Santorum may not win the nomination in 2016, but if he runs (and he continues to position himself as though he will) he will be the favorite. Not the lock, but the favorite. Just like Romney and McCain and Dole and GHW Bush and Reagan before him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2012, 11:38 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,929,248 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by F40 View Post
I am wondering if mittens has the gall to run again in 2016 after he loses again, maybe three times is the charm
LOL, Many people had Gall to run 3 or more times and lose each time:

Al Gore 1988, 1992, 2000
Joe Biden ran in 1988, 2008, and for vp in 2012
Estes Kefauver in 52,56 and 60
Adlai Stevenson actually got the nomination twice (52 and 56) and lost both times to Eisenhower. He didn't campaign in 60, but said if he gets picked at the convention he will run

But the King Daddy of them all was William Jennings Bryan. He ran at least 4 times. He was nominated 3 times (1896, 1900, 1908) and lost all three times.


Incidentally, all the people I mentioned above are Democrats. Either they have more faith in their men than the Republicans or these nominees are just hella convincing


Dole may be the man closest to the list of Democrats.
He was chosen for vp in 76 but lost
He ran for presidential nominee in 80 but lost to Reagan
Dole ran for the 3rd time in 88
Dole finally made nominee after 20 years of trying in 96, but got spanked by Clinton in the generals
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top