Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yeah. It's and old tired arguement. But when it comes down to it I support individual freedom. The 2 status quo candidates do not. Nor do they want to do anything about foreign policy or our finances.
But the thing is, we just cannot afford four more years of status quo candidates. I saw the alternative debate yesterday, I think even any one of them would make better presidents than those two. The third debate of them showed and proved that they're pretty much similar. Bush got us into this mess (who is not that different than Romney, definitely), and now Obama who is just barely rolling it along, with minimum progress and an enormous public debt that will, if continued, bankrupt the country. Plus the debt from another war (Iran) that will most probably happen if either Romney or Obama gets elected.
And just for the record, I see the points for both Obama and Romney - they do have their pros, definitely - but they're not what this country needs now.