Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I know, the 18th is all over the place along with the 3rd. He even has his marriage certificate on the web... WHY??? This says the 3rd.
Seven pages of arguing about when the Obama's were married and you still can't figure out why they'd post their marriage certificate on line? Do you really think this is the first time someone noticed the two different dates?
Exactly where in his book does he give his wedding date? The email circulating with this latest Obama "scandal" says it's on page 401 and I'm sure not seeing anything remotely about a wedding on page 401 or the two pages before or after that.
You and the sources you believe just like to make up crap and call it fact---anything you can to make Obama look bad.
here, since you cant follow the thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
I actually think you are correct.. Might be another one of those internet lies because the book doesnt say anything about their anniversary, nor mentions October at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
The irony of Obama shouting that Romney lies about everything, while (if this is true), he does this type of crap is astounding.
I didnt at all say the sources were true.. Do you know what IF means?
I dont need to make Obama look bad, he does that everytime he opens his mouth.
Seven pages of arguing about when the Obama's were married and you still can't figure out why they'd post their marriage certificate on line? Do you really think this is the first time someone noticed the two different dates?
This was meant to play on Obama supporters emotions like he does with everything else. That is how Obama supporters think with their emotions instead of with their brains.
Lose control of your emotions, and you’ll spin into confusion, isolation, and negativity.
Indeed.
Absolutely too many "coincidences" over the years......over & over again.
Nice. The poster who posted as "proof" a link to *askville* where probably some high school kid responded to a question about the Obama's wedding date with an incorrect answer and falsely attributed it to Obama's book has returned.
This is the issue I have with those RWNJ chain emails. They start off with utter baloney, in this case some anonymous web presence ("newbie431513") posts on askville, the nutjobs pick it up as reliable information and run with it, and then the rest of the nutjobs stroke their beards as to why Obama is "lying" about his wedding date. And not one of these sheeples thinks to verify the information by checking the source. In this case the text of the book is even ONLINE and available for anyone with a brain to see what is on p 401. You don't even have to BUY the book!
What a nice little social experiment we have going on here.
But his book, which would absolutely have to be proofread and checked many times for accuracy before it goes to print, as well as photostock images which would also have to be correct by the date to be historically relevant, say October 18.
Doesn't make sense.
I haven't read his book, nor do I trust the Cons on this site, so I will go with what Wikipedia says.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.