Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm a moderate so let me explain from a more neutral point of view.
Just as an observer I don't see Obama as much an intentional liar in this case, as a big time spinner. He did say the word "terror" in the speech but was speaking in general terms rather than specific on this event. I think Romney knew this as well, and that explains the way he seemed taken aback with what Obama said at the debate about it. Maybe they would have hashed it out, until the moderator Candy had to open her mouth in haste and end it by making a misstatement. Major mistake on her part IMO.
Just what does "no acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation" mean, if it wasn't referring to the actions that just took place--you know--the attacks that he was giving the speech about at that very moment. Talk about spin--you nuts are getting desperate.
I'm a moderate so let me explain from a more neutral point of view.
Just as an observer I don't see Obama as much an intentional liar in this case, as a big time spinner. He did say the word "terror" in the speech but was speaking in general terms rather than specific on this event.
Why was he in the Rose Garden again? Press conferences usually revolve around a specific event.
What again did Obama say while speaking in front of the UN?
He stood up for the first amendment rights of a people who created a video, while blaming the video for the riots.
Exactly!
And went on several media outlets and continued to blame the video. All the while still campaigning and hacking it up in Vegas as if we were not under attack. Pathetic.
Crowley did a great job. Romney was bullying her all night because he has no respect for women and that is how he treats them. She showed a great deal of restraint with him.
He didn't say he wanted her fired because of her political affiliation.
He wants her fired because of the way she handled the debate.
See the difference?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
lol...
