U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-25-2012, 01:18 PM
 
5,787 posts, read 3,977,425 times
Reputation: 849

Advertisements

Lately, Barack Obama has taken to claiming that he’s leading a slow but steady economic recovery, hampered by the nature of the 2007-8 Great Recession and other external factors.

Two different analyses out today rebut that assertion on the eve of the next advanced report on quarterly GDP:

First, Investors Business Daily’s John Merline refutes both the economic recovery and the supposedly mitigating context in its analysis, buttressed by a charted comparison to previous American recoveries.

Second, Reason Foundation’s Samuel Staley writes at Real Clear Markets that not only has Obamanomics utterly failed, it’s gone a long way to discrediting the very economic assumptions on which it was based.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-25-2012, 01:31 PM
 
5,787 posts, read 3,977,425 times
Reputation: 849
When faced with rebutting actual statistics, math, and facts.......Liberals are strangely silent???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2012, 01:35 PM
 
Location: One of the 13 original colonies.
10,168 posts, read 6,503,765 times
Reputation: 8034
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
When faced with rebutting actual statistics, math, and facts.......Liberals are strangely silent???


They never could deal with facts. They try to change the subject or just stare like a deer caught in the headlights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2012, 01:41 PM
 
2,004 posts, read 1,323,143 times
Reputation: 1099
And the financial collapse is still the worst since the Great Depression. The actual question is, why should we vote for the political party that actively opposed all efforts to get the economy back on track, rather than the democrats?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2012, 01:56 PM
 
39,336 posts, read 20,411,294 times
Reputation: 12795
Ahh the liberal lame blame game... Blame Bush, blame congress, blame congress, blame the weather, blame the movie.

Remember, Obama has already spent more money than anyone else in the history of the world. And he isn’t anywhere near done yet. By the time he gets through pushing his socialist agenda through the Congress, all U.S. Citizens will be living below the poverty line and the only entity that will have any money at all will be the government. Now, how he figures that this will create jobs and fix the economy is anyone’s guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top