Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Amen. I voted for O because there really was no alternative. I did not want to see America become a plutocracy/theocracy run by a bunch of Jesus cultist wack jobs. We see how that turned out with bush.
How are things different now? The economy is still in the crapper. We are still involved in never ending wars in the Middle East. Out of control spending in Congress hasn't been curbed. Your mistake was in thinking that there were only 2 people running for President when you said there was no alternative.
I doubt you watched it. Otherwise a comment on why it was bad would follow instead of a cheerleader comment.
What is bad about it?
Paul agrees with the 'abolitionists' and says that slavery was an important issue. His gripe is with the centralized government, especially the banking system. He is also obviously anti-war. He says that many other countries got rid of slavery by simply paying for their freedom, thus avoiding the bloodshed of war.
Paul agrees with the 'abolitionists' and says that slavery was an important issue. His gripe is with the centralized government, especially the banking system. He is also obviously anti-war. He says that many other countries got rid of slavery by simply paying for their freedom, thus avoiding the bloodshed of war.
Yep. Slavery, see what happens when you compromise and forget about what the country was founded on. From day one the "one percent" had their mitts on our freedoms.
Except Ron Paul is essentially the mordern day version of Heinrich Brüning with his Austrian ideology.
Nope.
Brüning took money out of the hands of the private sector by increasing taxes. Complete opposite of what Ron Paul stands for. Strange that you missed something as glaring as that. hmmm
Ron Paul has always said government should never be involved in the role of society. Ron Paul also is not in favor of controlling the economy. No one can successfully manage the economy, he knows that. It's a shame others do not, even after centuries of proof that it cannot be managed by a central policy. We the people make the market, not a king and his court who force their price and wage controls on private industry.
He wants plans by the many and not by the few.
In all the honesty, Ron Paul would get votes from GOP, independent and Dem, he would have chance to win. For instance my vote, a typical independent's vote.
In all the honesty, Ron Paul would get votes from GOP, independent and Dem, he would have chance to win. For instance my vote, a typical independent's vote.
A libertarian might get votes from all parties, but won't get enough to ever win. You put Gary Johnson or whatever nutjob you guys support in 4 years, and watch him/her get crushed.
A libertarian might get votes from all parties, but won't get enough to ever win. You put Gary Johnson or whatever nutjob you guys support in 4 years, and watch him/her get crushed.
Or you can keep voting for the same horrible policies that ruined the economy and makes us less safe. Your way we have have seen the evidence first hand, we the people are getting crushed. The nutjobs are the ones who think doing the same thing will yield different results. It's time those nutjobs woke up.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.