Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I have to question the intelligence of those who predict a Hillary run. She will be 67, and she has been adamant about not running, so why do people insist she will run?
I have to question the intelligence of those who predict a Hillary run. She will be 67, and she has been adamant about not running, so why do people insist she will run?
I have to question the intelligence of those who predict a Hillary run. She will be 67, and she has been adamant about not running, so why do people insist she will run?
Since she would be the very heavy favorite to win the Democratic nomination, it will be hard for people - including me - to believe she won't run. She also would arguably be more qualifed than any candidate in modern history to be president and would have a strong shot at the presidency.
hillary would make an excellent VP. not that much personality but lots of brains much smarter than last 3 presidents.
this speaks volumns about the american public but nothing negative about hillary.
I have to question the intelligence of those who predict a Hillary run. She will be 67, and she has been adamant about not running, so why do people insist she will run?
I don't insist she will run. Those who think they know whether she will or will not are fools.
But as far as those who declare they won't run for President, a certain Governor of Texas was was saying the same thing as recently as 2011. And a certain junior Senator from Illinois was saying such in 2005.
She may or she may not. Neither eventuality would be particularly surprising.
Since she would be the very heavy favorite to win the Democratic nomination, it will be hard for people - including me - to believe she won't run. She also would arguably be more qualifed than any candidate in modern history to be president and would have a strong shot at the presidency.
How would she be "qualified"?
Name one executive position that she has held.
If the best you can come up with is Department of State - I will counter with people who have run actual states - like Sarah Palin.
Hillary Clinton is a political pawn - that is why she was thrown under the bus over Benghazi, which was President Obama's fault - not hers.
She is not a bad Secretary of State, but she has zero qualifications to be president.
She would, however, be an improvement over President Obama.
Democrats voted for four more years of his FAILED policies.
I don't think she will. I doubt we will see too many retreads in the next election. Clean sweep is what everyone needs.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
