Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's obvious the OP doesn't want to enter into an intelligent conversation. By starting off with calling names, the tone is set, and anything said will further the intolerant agenda.
Add to the name-calling the bollixed syntax and god-awful grammar of OP. This is what the left does. They take a complicated question and reduce it to a cartoon version, then act as if they've scored a great intellectual coup. And they say that the right side of the aisle is the side of hicks, rubes, and the generally IQ-challenged.
The truth is that Romney evolved over the years from being a standard issue, green-job loving, gun-controlling RINO to being a genuine limited-gov't conservative. Look up his 2012 CPAC speech to learn about his evolution. After he won the nomination, instead of running back to the left, he continued rightward. He picked a hard-right conservative in Ryan, instead of the safe choice of Portman. Remember the '47%' comments? This was pretty close to the essence of the conservative, limited-gov't argument, and he said this when he thought he was off the record, when he was presumably expressing his most unvarnished thoughts.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 23 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,553 posts, read 16,542,682 times
Reputation: 6040
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz
Add to the name-calling the bollixed syntax and god-awful grammar of OP. This is what the left does. They take a complicated question and reduce it to a cartoon version, then act as if they've scored a great intellectual coup. And they say that the right side of the aisle is the side of hicks, rubes, and the generally IQ-challenged.
The truth is that Romney evolved over the years from being a standard issue, green-job loving, gun-controlling RINO to being a genuine limited-gov't conservative. Look up his 2012 CPAC speech to learn about his evolution. After he won the nomination, instead of running back to the left, he continued rightward. He picked a hard-right conservative in Ryan, instead of the safe choice of Portman. Remember the '47%' comments? This was pretty close to the essence of the conservative, limited-gov't argument, and he said this when he thought he was off the record, when he was presumably expressing his most unvarnished thoughts.
So you are saying you dont even open the Conservative started threads on this site since they do the exact same thing ?
calling half of the nation lazy is moronic, no matter if you believe it is true or not.
Add to the name-calling the bollixed syntax and god-awful grammar of OP. This is what the left does. They take a complicated question and reduce it to a cartoon version, then act as if they've scored a great intellectual coup. And they say that the right side of the aisle is the side of hicks, rubes, and the generally IQ-challenged.
The truth is that Romney evolved over the years from being a standard issue, green-job loving, gun-controlling RINO to being a genuine limited-gov't conservative. Look up his 2012 CPAC speech to learn about his evolution. After he won the nomination, instead of running back to the left, he continued rightward. He picked a hard-right conservative in Ryan, instead of the safe choice of Portman. Remember the '47%' comments? This was pretty close to the essence of the conservative, limited-gov't argument, and he said this when he thought he was off the record, when he was presumably expressing his most unvarnished thoughts.
I would believe that argument if it wasnt for the fact that after the election, the biggest complaint from republicans was that he wasn't conservative enough. In fact I remember reading articles where during the campaign, there were still questions whether he was a true conservative.
It's obvious the OP doesn't want to enter into an intelligent conversation. By starting off with calling names, the tone is set, and anything said will further the intolerant agenda.
how was I calling names? I'm just asking, if you guys are all about personal responsibility, why didn't michelle Bachmann get the nomination? She was part of the tea party.
The argument was never about you voting for Obama over Romeny, but rather why didnt you vote for Perry or Huntsman, Bachmann, Paul, Cain, Gingrich and who ever else was in the primaries.
Also, why even go off into the BS messiah arguments? why cant you have a civilized conversation without hyperbole ?
I did.
The fact that you think all Rs voted for Romney in the primaries might be the silliest thing I've ever read. It also proves you don't understand what you read/hear when primary wins were being announced.
It's obvious the OP doesn't want to enter into an intelligent conversation. By starting off with calling names, the tone is set, and anything said will further the intolerant agenda.
I don't see where he called anybody anything, except to tag Bachmann as a loon, which she most assuredly is. I thought the question was valid, and I think the conservatives don't want to answer because it is obvious that there are not enough of them to elect anyone, period. All they can do is sulk and dream.
The fact that you think all Rs voted for Romney in the primaries might be the silliest thing I've ever read.
So, then you agree that all the posters that keep referring to liberals as "Obama Voters" is equally silly? What other choice was there in the election?
"Where was the personal responsibility to elect a true conservative?"
I suppose that would be the responsible thing to do if the entire electorate was comprised of conservatives but please by all means keep on voting for "true conservatives." This liberal will be forever grateful.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
