Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hmm, a novel reason to vote for a candidate. . the sole candidate who can claim working momhood.
So you can dismiss all the questions regarding her ethics, the scandals, besides the fact that she wants to take our country towards socialism?
And more recently that she seems to be incapable of answering a direct question (last nights debate). I mean really, what is she afraid of?
Even her fellow democratiac candidates accused her of double-talk, ducking questions, and vacilating on almost every issue.
It's nice that she is a working mother but maybe she should run for the local PTA. . .
She had 1 child and is married. She is not qualified. Her hubby Bill Clinton will be running the White House again.
She tried to push through the medical thing when Bill was Prez and it did not fly why in the world does she think it will now?
She can't answer direct question because she does not have one!
Actually, her response on the issue was sort of doubletalk. It's pretty much the same sort of cognitive dissonance that a lot of us have on the issue of illegal immigration.
She said she understood governor Spitzer's plan, and that it "made sense." She didn't say she SUPPORTED IT. She then said we need comprehensive immigration reform, and that Bush had failed us in immigration reform. The rationale sort of does make sense, of course, in terms of wanting to know who is in the state.
But as far as NY is concerned, everyone knows that most illegals are probably not going to be lining up to get the special illegal immigrant version of drivers licenses that New York is going to be issuing, since it basically advertises to the world that you're illegal......
In other words, she continues the charade that amnesty equals "comprehensive immigration reform" and tacitly supports an idea (drivers licenses for illegals) that is patently absurd.
That ain't "cognitive dissonance." It's blowing smoke up our collective asses.
I would love to see her debate Dick Cheney. It would be like cobra versus cobra. The dance of death. He would be wearing that stupid sneer of his. She would have her best poker face, the one she had after she was confronted by the "Bill and the blue dress" scandal.
Hmmm... Now that I think about it, I would PAY to see that! They should offer it as a "Pay Per View" thing sometime down the road. I would say that they could make it a "Fight to the Death" but Cheney has that bad ticker and all so maybe it wouldn't be fair. He'd have to bring a gun.
That would be the highest rated program of the year Ahhhh now back 2 reality, lol..........
In other words, she continues the charade that amnesty equals "comprehensive immigration reform" and tacitly supports an idea (drivers licenses for illegals) that is patently absurd.
That ain't "cognitive dissonance." It's blowing smoke up our collective asses.
Wonder where she learned how to do it so well?
Well law school of course and Bill!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
