Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
and if she were to run against Hillary, so much mud would be thrown, from both, the winner would emerge as the loser. There is no way, she is ready to be President, nor could she win in my opinion. The left likes to talk about the candidates on the right, well remember most independents actually describe themselves as being either conservative or leaning that way. They hold the key to the winner and as a group, they would never support someone like her. There is more to winning than being popular in New England.
she struggled to beat brown in probably the most blue state in the US. she has zero national appeal. swing states would swing back the other way, because the woman is a mentally unstable maniac with zero national appeal.
As lionsgator said, she has ZERO national appeal, just about the same as Ted Cruz. Extreme left wing or extreme right wing candidates have no chance in a national election. It takes a semi-moderate message to win but that really puts the Republicans at a disadvantage as someone middle of the road cannot get past the primaries.
Gregg - According to the Republicans, Obama is far left.
SJ4 - I doubt that the Democrats would field an all female ticket. Since Clinton is left of center, they would need a moderate, probably, younger male, VP.
I see a Clinton/Warren ticket in 2016, setting up Warren for President in 2024.
I'll have what you're smoking. I am not sure that ticket would win a single state.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.