U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-06-2013, 06:18 AM
 
Location: North America
18,343 posts, read 11,636,703 times
Reputation: 7613

Advertisements

She came in third on a new Quinnipac poll, jut behind Hillary. She evokes passion in the party. Is this a recipe for a potential Presidential run?

Watch your back, Hills.

Why you shouldn

Why you shouldn’t underestimate Elizabeth Warren


When we first put freshman Sen. Elizabeth Warren on our rankings of the 10 Democrats most likely to wind up as the party’s presidential nominee in 2016, many people scoffed.
She just got elected! She’s not interested in running! It’s too damn early! Get off my lawn! (All but that last one is true.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-06-2013, 06:59 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
69,382 posts, read 79,577,446 times
Reputation: 38711
and if she were to run against Hillary, so much mud would be thrown, from both, the winner would emerge as the loser. There is no way, she is ready to be President, nor could she win in my opinion. The left likes to talk about the candidates on the right, well remember most independents actually describe themselves as being either conservative or leaning that way. They hold the key to the winner and as a group, they would never support someone like her. There is more to winning than being popular in New England.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 09:04 AM
 
4,291 posts, read 2,748,855 times
Reputation: 1313
she struggled to beat brown in probably the most blue state in the US. she has zero national appeal. swing states would swing back the other way, because the woman is a mentally unstable maniac with zero national appeal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Fort Payne Alabama
1,071 posts, read 1,474,269 times
Reputation: 2033
As lionsgator said, she has ZERO national appeal, just about the same as Ted Cruz. Extreme left wing or extreme right wing candidates have no chance in a national election. It takes a semi-moderate message to win but that really puts the Republicans at a disadvantage as someone middle of the road cannot get past the primaries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 09:51 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,330 posts, read 19,035,700 times
Reputation: 18436
She is infinitely better than any Republican, but I don't think she's interested in running. Time will tell though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 10:34 AM
 
10,115 posts, read 6,736,457 times
Reputation: 3408
I think she'll be a major player in the Senate, but she's never indicated she wants to run beyond that roll.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 02:56 PM
 
2,633 posts, read 2,965,646 times
Reputation: 1669
I see a Clinton/Warren ticket in 2016, setting up Warren for President in 2024.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 03:53 PM
 
Location: Emmaus, PA
3,025 posts, read 2,063,843 times
Reputation: 2159
Gregg - According to the Republicans, Obama is far left.

SJ4 - I doubt that the Democrats would field an all female ticket. Since Clinton is left of center, they would need a moderate, probably, younger male, VP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 03:54 PM
 
Location: Boston, MA
10,955 posts, read 7,732,782 times
Reputation: 5314
She had to be dragged into the senatorial race. Maybe she'll be dragged into the race for the White House.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2013, 07:14 PM
 
4,291 posts, read 2,748,855 times
Reputation: 1313
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoke_Jaguar4 View Post
I see a Clinton/Warren ticket in 2016, setting up Warren for President in 2024.
I'll have what you're smoking. I am not sure that ticket would win a single state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top