Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The headline should be: "McAuliffe wins. Neanderthal Man loses."
it should actually read, "terrorist wins in virginia because of carpetbaggers." sounds harsh, but is 100% accurate. the attack ads the democrats were airing during the redskins game last weekend were freaking vile. the democrat who bought the governors office in VA is a sick human being.
Many of them voted with their lady parts on the foolish belief that Cuccinelli wanted to steal their condoms. Sad.
Again, I ask: How do you know this? If you can't show me how you read the minds of all those women, this post is just pure BS, and that's putting it kindly.
My guess would be they voted with their lady parts because Cooch wanted to force women to undergo state-mandated rape. I'm pretty sure a lot of polls showed that women were unimpressed with his attempts to criminalize certain types of sex acts.
But hey, that's just me. Make up whatever stuff you want, just don't expect intelligent people to find you remotely credible.
My favorite Democrat lie from the VA governor race was that Cuccinelli was going to ban birth control. Are people really that gullible?
When a key part of one's platform is that something inside a woman's body is a human from conception then, yes, a number of us out here are that..."gullible".
I suggest you look into the various forms of birth control out here and how they work.
Status:
"Apparently the worst poster on CD"
(set 27 days ago)
27,647 posts, read 16,133,597 times
Reputation: 19066
Quote:
Originally Posted by brentwoodgirl
Women as a whole voted 51% McAuliffe, 42% Cuccinelli, and Independents voted for Cuccinelli by 9% over McAuliffe.
Independents chose a staunchly pro-life, anti-gay marriage, Christian homeschooling father of 7 by 9% points. Cuccinelli closed a double digit lead and turned the race into a nail biter, and that's with a fake Libertarian candidate taking 7% of the vote.
Dems should be terrified of what Obamacare will do to the 2014 midterms based on last nights result.
Again, I ask: How do you know this? If you can't show me how you read the minds of all those women, this post is just pure BS, and that's putting it kindly.
My guess would be they voted with their lady parts because Cooch wanted to force women to undergo state-mandated rape. I'm pretty sure a lot of polls showed that women were unimpressed with his attempts to criminalize certain types of sex acts.
But hey, that's just me. Make up whatever stuff you want, just don't expect intelligent people to find you remotely credible.
kinda sounds like a government background check for a firearm. question, would they respect the doctor patient privilege for the women? they certainly wouldn't for the state sodomy to by a hunting rifle. what would you say if all women had to submit to a psychiatric evaluation before killing a fetus? abortion has a 100% fatality rate. people who buy guns probably have a .0000001% fatality rate.
kinda sounds like a government background check for a firearm. question, would they respect the doctor patient privilege for the women? they certainly wouldn't for the state sodomy to by a hunting rifle. what would you say if all women had to submit to a psychiatric evaluation before killing a fetus? abortion has a 100% fatality rate. people who buy guns probably have a .0000001% fatality rate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by brentwoodgirl
Women as a whole voted 51% McAuliffe, 42% Cuccinelli, and Independents voted for Cuccinelli by 9% over McAuliffe.
Independents chose a staunchly pro-life, anti-gay marriage, Christian homeschooling father of 7 by 9% points. Cuccinelli closed a double digit lead and turned the race into a nail biter, and that's with a fake Libertarian candidate taking 7% of the vote.
Dems should be terrified of what Obamacare will do to the 2014 midterms based on last nights result.
All true, and I'd also add that the so-called Libertarian condidate was a shill financed by the likes of Warren Buffet. So it was another Perot style shell game.
kinda sounds like a government background check for a firearm.
You had to have to have something physically inserted to get your firearm? Yeah, that may be taking things a bit too far.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
