Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-15-2014, 04:31 PM
 
1,970 posts, read 1,761,249 times
Reputation: 991

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
you are smart enough to know the market isn't controlled much at all by who is in or out of office, but more by world economy and events.

LOLOLOLOL Uh huh!!! You really believe that? The world economy is controlled by a few...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-16-2014, 04:54 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,711,350 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by MORebelWoman View Post
LOLOLOLOL Uh huh!!! You really believe that? The world economy is controlled by a few...
But it isn't controlled by the President or our elected representatives, don't you agree? If you think the President has any control over the market you might want to re-think that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2014, 04:57 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,711,350 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
You "all know the answers" do you?
Could you be any more presumptuous?

I feel exactly the same way about the Kennedy's, the Paul's, the Clintons...
I will NOT vote for Mrs. Clinton if she is the nominee.
You may not, but do you have any idea how many will? I would have trouble voting for a Bush again as well: will I come out and say I will not? No, because I don't who the opponent might be, but I do think there are more out there that would love to see the Clintons and even more the Kennedy's continue to get involved in politics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2014, 05:02 AM
 
Location: US
742 posts, read 678,447 times
Reputation: 213
Easier way to bring the NeoCons back in office with Hispanic votes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2014, 06:45 AM
 
8,061 posts, read 4,884,494 times
Reputation: 2460
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmagoo View Post
A bit of a national security slip up on 9-11 2001 but do go on if you like. At the end of this embarrassing 8 years we were losing 750,000 jobs a month for 5 consecutive months.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

First Bombing of the World Trade towers, Presient Clinton, and failure of capture Bin Laden we would of not had 911. Yes you are correct about the first 5 months after 911. It was a time to remember like Perl Harbor.

What Bush did and President was turn our situation around quickly. . Bush turned the challenge around and we had employment near 3% and if you had a pulse you had a job. Home sales was at their high peak and industries was at its peak. Under Bush we enjoyed lower taxes and incentives to grow business. People spent more thusly the reply effect of a good economy.

Most salaries at a level people could support their families and most people were living the American Dream.

President Obama and the fully control both house we endured record unemployment 12% and underemployment. Our most experienced workers an not find jobs. Most American Families have to have a second income.

Obama care is a wrecking ball to this country and even his own people are pulling away. President Obama and VP Biden wasted million of dollars on the stimulus packages. Bide task was to manage where the American Tax dollar went. They failed miserable and most of it was to prop up unions and useless "Infrastructure Programs. Sadly to day not of that money is accounted for .

Obamas fiasco on Solindra and the Solar industry was wasted and the projects failed. Just to add salt to add salt to wounds China companies took them over!

We have more people on welfare and we have the highest tax rates on record.

Spending, we got to had it to the President and the Democrat's in racking a bill of 18 trillion dollars. President Bush was high, but not near the level of Obama.

President Obama is trying to exceed this Constitutional Powers. If it was not for the minority in the Senate and Rep taking over the Senate this Administration would run carry out their plans to convert American into a welfare country.

So you guys on the left have nerve to defend this President and his failed Policies!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2014, 06:55 AM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,668,392 times
Reputation: 9174
Quote:
Originally Posted by sargentodiaz View Post
Exactly why I posted the thread, Watching the Hate Bush crowd rant and rave is great!
No kidding.

Somewhere on this forum, a good year ago, I predicted "P" will run and be successful.

And look! We even have a dissenter whining because the family name is being carried forth. How pathetic is that! lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2014, 07:27 AM
 
Location: Vegas
1,782 posts, read 2,138,563 times
Reputation: 1789
Liberals rules of discussion:

Rule #..... When you don't like the way the discussion is going - divert!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2014, 07:32 AM
 
12,265 posts, read 6,469,490 times
Reputation: 9435
Quote:
Originally Posted by GHOSTRIDER AZ View Post
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

First Bombing of the World Trade towers, Presient Clinton, and failure of capture Bin Laden we would of not had 911. Yes you are correct about the first 5 months after 911. It was a time to remember like Perl Harbor.

What Bush did and President was turn our situation around quickly. . Bush turned the challenge around and we had employment near 3% and if you had a pulse you had a job. Home sales was at their high peak and industries was at its peak. Under Bush we enjoyed lower taxes and incentives to grow business. People spent more thusly the reply effect of a good economy.

Most salaries at a level people could support their families and most people were living the American Dream.

President Obama and the fully control both house we endured record unemployment 12% and underemployment. Our most experienced workers an not find jobs. Most American Families have to have a second income.

Obama care is a wrecking ball to this country and even his own people are pulling away. President Obama and VP Biden wasted million of dollars on the stimulus packages. Bide task was to manage where the American Tax dollar went. They failed miserable and most of it was to prop up unions and useless "Infrastructure Programs. Sadly to day not of that money is accounted for .

Obamas fiasco on Solindra and the Solar industry was wasted and the projects failed. Just to add salt to add salt to wounds China companies took them over!

We have more people on welfare and we have the highest tax rates on record.

Spending, we got to had it to the President and the Democrat's in racking a bill of 18 trillion dollars. President Bush was high, but not near the level of Obama.

President Obama is trying to exceed this Constitutional Powers. If it was not for the minority in the Senate and Rep taking over the Senate this Administration would run carry out their plans to convert American into a welfare country.

So you guys on the left have nhttp://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/erve to defend this President and his failed Policies!
After the first WTC bombing the perps were arrested and jailed. After 9-11 Bush said he didn`t care where BL was. Spending? You couldn`t be more wrong according to ultra conservative Forbes.
Who Is The Smallest Government Spender Since Eisenhower? Would You Believe It's Barack Obama? - Forbes
Don`t facts su*k?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2014, 07:44 AM
 
Location: Vegas
1,782 posts, read 2,138,563 times
Reputation: 1789
Here we go again! Yet another "diverter" poster trying to get away from the original subject.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2014, 07:47 AM
 
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,941,561 times
Reputation: 2385
Quote:
Originally Posted by antarez View Post
How many idiots in that family have the same name?

He can call himself George or Jorge, outside of Texas it doesn't mean much.
He will be 48 in 2024...Maybe he'll matter outside of Texas then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top