Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
so far she hasn't announced: OP what time do you think she is going to make the big announcement?
Unfortunately, the masses don't care about Benghazi, they are more concerned with ideology...and the ideology of the left is that they "champion" women's and minority causes...even if it's only in name.
I thought the Dems were "pro-choice." If the Dems don't get at least one person to run against her, they lose the ability to chose their candidate and to hear them in the debates.
Unfortunately, the masses don't care about Benghazi, they are more concerned with ideology...and the ideology of the left is that they "champion" women's and minority causes...even if it's only in name.
Has our country gotten so selfish? As far as I am concern she has done justice to any of these so call woman issues.
Hillary Clinton will be in Iowa on Sunday, and the national press is dispensing with the formalities: She is running for president. No if's, and's or deeply personal decisions about it.
"You don't go to Iowa if you're not running."
It's still a rumor until the former Lady sings. I would have expected her to wait until after the November elections.
If you'd have read your own link, you would never have thought she wouldn't wait until after the first of the year.
You cite vague 'rumors' and can't (apparently) even find a link - seriously, you can find a link for any old nonsense somewhere on the internet - so you post a link that refutes your headline?
Unfortunately, the masses don't care about Benghazi, they are more concerned with ideology...and the ideology of the left is that they "champion" women's and minority causes...even if it's only in name.
I think and hope you are wrong. No, it will not be a huge issue because time has a way of healing or at least makes us forget, but put that with other issues and she will not be a shoe in I do not think. If she is, she may have even more trouble running against whomever we nominate. She might get a little complacent.
I think and hope you are wrong. No, it will not be a huge issue because time has a way of healing or at least makes us forget, but put that with other issues and she will not be a shoe in I do not think. If she is, she may have even more trouble running against whomever we nominate. She might get a little complacent.
I kind of doubt she's going to be complacent after the way she was blindsided in 2008.
09-15-2014, 01:49 PM
i7pXFLbhE3gq
n/a posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshim
Unfortunately, the masses don't care about Benghazi, they are more concerned with ideology...and the ideology of the left is that they "champion" women's and minority causes...even if it's only in name.
"The masses" cared when it happened and wanted to know why. Then "the masses" got satisfactory answers and moved on. There's a difference between not caring and being able to accept reality as it is. The fact that the far right cannot accept reality does not mean that the sane portion of the country doesn't care.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
