Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-11-2015, 10:36 PM
 
1,720 posts, read 1,304,511 times
Reputation: 1134

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmarc View Post
Poppycock. How do you know how many people have or haven't heard of Jim Webb? One low information voter, no matter how young, "progressive" and intelligent is not representative. Does Webb have the name recognition of Hillary? No. So what? That'll change quickly if he decides to run.

Republicans would pit their shants if Webb ended up being the nominee. Repubs desperately want Hillary to run. I get it.

I see what you're doing here. Gotcha!
No, no one knows who Webb is. He's currently polling at about 2%. In other words, he has no plausible chance:
RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-12-2015, 04:49 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by PanapolicRiddle View Post
No, no one knows who Webb is. He's currently polling at about 2%. In other words, he has no plausible chance:
RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination
What was Obama polling at in January 2007?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2015, 10:06 AM
 
Location: On the "Left Coast", somewhere in "the Land of Fruits & Nuts"
8,852 posts, read 10,456,964 times
Reputation: 6670
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmarc View Post
Poppycock. How do you know how many people have or haven't heard of Jim Webb? One low information voter, no matter how young, "progressive" and intelligent is not representative. Does Webb have the name recognition of Hillary? No. So what? That'll change quickly if he decides to run.

Republicans would pit their shants if Webb ended up being the nominee. Repubs desperately want Hillary to run. I get it.

I see what you're doing here. Gotcha!
There's no 'gotcha' here, he's just pointing out the obvious. I'm all for Jim Webb, he's exactly what's needed. But practically-speaking, there are just too many factors supporting the 'Hillary" sense of 'inevitability', not least of which is the 'symbolism' she represents for a LOT of aging Boomer women. And there's nuthin' like a nasty 'intra-party' squabble (especially with 'gender' overtones) to rescue Defeat from the jaws of Victory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2015, 11:04 AM
 
5,687 posts, read 7,183,271 times
Reputation: 4327
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
What was Obama polling at in January 2007?
Good one! They won't let me rep you again, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2015, 11:09 AM
 
5,687 posts, read 7,183,271 times
Reputation: 4327
Quote:
Originally Posted by mateo45 View Post
There's no 'gotcha' here, he's just pointing out the obvious. I'm all for Jim Webb, he's exactly what's needed. But practically-speaking, there are just too many factors supporting the 'Hillary" sense of 'inevitability', not least of which is the 'symbolism' she represents for a LOT of aging Boomer women. And there's nuthin' like a nasty 'intra-party' squabble (especially with 'gender' overtones) to rescue Defeat from the jaws of Victory.
As an aging boomer woman, I don't get the appeal of Hillary one. little. bit. Webb, on the other hand...

Heh, JMO, but I think there are aging boomer women who would give lip service support to Hillary among their friends and associates, but in the end would pull the lever for Jim.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2015, 11:51 AM
 
Location: On the "Left Coast", somewhere in "the Land of Fruits & Nuts"
8,852 posts, read 10,456,964 times
Reputation: 6670
^ Well, guess you missed the level of 'competitiveness' in 2008 when Obama challenged Hillary, which is generally regarded to have been 'patched' only by cutting the Clintons a 'deal'…. which she definitely ain't gonna do again! And there were no small number of lib 'feminists' even back then, who were pretty 'vocal' in championing her "entitlement".

BTW, I've noticed that even a lot of otherwise loyal Fox-lovin' conservative women here, seem willing to give her some 'respect', and certainly a lot more than they show any other Dem!

Hillary Clinton's 2008 slaps still sting President Obama
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2015, 12:53 PM
 
5,687 posts, read 7,183,271 times
Reputation: 4327
Quote:
Originally Posted by mateo45 View Post
^ Well, guess you missed the level of 'competitiveness' in 2008 when Obama challenged Hillary, which is generally regarded to have been 'patched' only by cutting the Clintons a 'deal'…. which she definitely ain't gonna do again! And there were no small number of lib 'feminists' even back then, who were pretty 'vocal' in championing her "entitlement".

BTW, I've noticed that even a lot of otherwise loyal Fox-lovin' conservative women here, seem willing to give her some 'respect', and certainly a lot more than they show any other Dem!

Hillary Clinton's 2008 slaps still sting President Obama
yes, but remember, too, that she was more or less of a fail at State. Like she really stunk out the joint, especially during Benghazi. She basically left her employees to rot and die, in fact she was kind of MIA, as I recall, although I remember her blaming some crazy video for her dereliction of duty. That's how I see it, anyway. And that would be my issue with her in a crisis. "What difference does it make?"

Webb could do some serious damage to the repubs that Hillary just couldn't. A lot of working class folks would back him for sure, IF they knew more about him. And therein lies the problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2015, 02:35 PM
 
Location: On the "Left Coast", somewhere in "the Land of Fruits & Nuts"
8,852 posts, read 10,456,964 times
Reputation: 6670
^ I agree, Webb would be very effective at communicating with blue collar folks, which Dems have done a lousy job of reaching, ever since the advent of so-called "Reagan Democrats". So I hope his campaign can really get some traction going.

Though as much as I like him, unfortunately it's also hard to say whether he really has the same "fire in the belly" to go toe-to-toe with her, let alone attract all her 'loyalists' who are convinced it's "her time" (and theirs)! It'll be "interesting"!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2015, 03:44 PM
 
5,687 posts, read 7,183,271 times
Reputation: 4327
Quote:
Originally Posted by mateo45 View Post
^ I agree, Webb would be very effective at communicating with blue collar folks, which Dems have done a lousy job of reaching, ever since the advent of so-called "Reagan Democrats". So I hope his campaign can really get some traction going.

Though as much as I like him, unfortunately it's also hard to say whether he really has the same "fire in the belly" to go toe-to-toe with her, let alone attract all her 'loyalists' who are convinced it's "her time" (and theirs)! It'll be "interesting"!
I do feel that Webb, despite his age, projects more of an image of vitality than she does. My sense is that he's still weighing his options, but once he commits, (if he does commit) you'll see that fire in the belly. He's got it, you can see it in his eyes. In debates, I think he'd demolish her. Not that hard to do, btw, after that "What difference does it make" performance on Capitol Hill. Also I don't see where she has much in the way of convictions.

The long green, however, is another story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2015, 04:08 PM
 
Location: On the "Left Coast", somewhere in "the Land of Fruits & Nuts"
8,852 posts, read 10,456,964 times
Reputation: 6670
^ Oh, she annoys me too, no question about it. Her voice is really grating, and she's actually a lot more hawkish than many republicans! But if the only choice ends up being either her or the Jebster, guess I'll just have to 'hold my nose' and choose the 'lesser of two evils" (although a Clinton/Webb ticket would still be pretty powerful).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top