Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-12-2015, 08:59 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
12,755 posts, read 9,643,519 times
Reputation: 13169

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
Just because some ancestor's of the indios migrated here long ago doesn't give their descendants a special classification of "Native American".
They are called Native Americans because they were here first.

They were already living here when European explorers 'discovered' North America, ergo they are Native.

Simple enough.

I think Canada calls their 'Indians' First People, because they were there first.

 
Old 02-12-2015, 09:25 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,536 posts, read 17,214,216 times
Reputation: 17562
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePage View Post
It is about balance, folks !
Why not elect a Navajo, a Chippewa or a Dakota President?
Just asking
Go for it!

Haven't you heard?
No one meeting stated qualifications is excluded from running for office of the president, even the tribes mentioned.
Who would stand in your way?

Hey Elizabeth Warren might be a good choice for your novelty election at the sacrifice of the country. Doesn't matter she lied about her lineage, it is a mater of genetics by desire. The media wouldn't even question it and you'd be killing two birds with one stone.

You just need to find a 'qualified' candidate and get the votes. Simple.

Unfortunately the confused and bewildered have demonstrated their definition of 'qualified' has nothing to do with experience, leadership, ethics or ability. Then there are the perenial victims who see conspiracy against them and "their kind" everywhere.
 
Old 02-12-2015, 09:27 AM
 
Location: Iowa, USA
6,542 posts, read 4,092,998 times
Reputation: 3806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
12,000 years? You got a link to your assertions? Doesn't matter anyway. Everyone born here is a native American. Just because some ancestor's of the indios migrated here long ago doesn't give their descendants a special classification of "Native American". They are no more "Native American" than the descendants of the Europeans are.
Yes, everyone born here is a native American. But to capitalize it (Native American) would be incorrect. That term goes to the indigenous people who are not of European (or really anything east of the Atlantic) decent. This is widely accepted as being true. Other terms exist for this group as well. But the term 'Native American' is there's. That doesn't mean you and I aren't native Americans. But the thing is, no one who is a natural born citizen feels the need to say they are a native American unless it's in situations like this where patriotism suddenly trumps reason: they just describe themselves as American.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
The PC folks will disagree. But technically, you are correct. "Native American" includes everyone born in America.

native

: born in a particular place

—used to refer to the place where a person was born and raised

: belonging to a person since birth or childhood

Native - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
No. Native American is an ethnic/racial group. It's different from 'native American,' which applies to anyone born in the US.

This is just like he word holocaust. See, there's THE Holocaust, which applies to the Nazis attempted extermination of the Jews. Then there's just the word Holocaust, which can apply to any widespread killing/genocide. There are those who would get upset that describing something, like say the Armenian genocide, as a holocaust, because some people have a need to feel special about their title. However, the term is far older than that and can have a lot of different meanings. Same with Native American. Capitalizing it makes it different from not capitalizing it. The context in which it is used changes the meaning. Many words and phrases have this characteristic; do you have a problem with those as well?
 
Old 02-12-2015, 10:27 AM
 
723 posts, read 805,888 times
Reputation: 400
Hello,
People can play with the definition of the word Native, let's be clear on this: I'm referring to those people who were here before Europeans came in.
So if the word Native raises questions, then let's say this:
Isn't time to Elect somebody who is 100% a descendant of the people who were on this soil before Europeans came in?

Last edited by ThePage; 02-12-2015 at 10:47 AM..
 
Old 02-12-2015, 10:29 AM
 
2,777 posts, read 1,780,746 times
Reputation: 2418
How many Native American politicians are even out there?
I'd be all for it if I liked their platform.
 
Old 02-12-2015, 11:06 AM
 
Location: USA
31,015 posts, read 22,056,089 times
Reputation: 19069
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePage View Post
Hello,
People can play with the definition of the word Native, let's be clear on this: I'm referring to those people who were here before Europeans came in.
So if the word Native raises questions, then let's say this:
Isn't time to Elect somebody who is 100% a descendant of the people who were on this soil before Europeans came in?

100% huh? how about this guy? He's only 1/32 American Indian but he's Chief of the Cherokee tribe. Is that good enough? I grew up in Northern Arizona, if anyone that looked like Bill John Baker said he was Native American people would laugh.
Attached Thumbnails
A Time to Elect A Native American  President?-principal_chief_bill_john_baker.jpg  

Last edited by LS Jaun; 02-12-2015 at 11:14 AM..
 
Old 02-12-2015, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
5,294 posts, read 10,203,482 times
Reputation: 2136
YES!!! That'd be awesome if we had a Native American president.
 
Old 02-12-2015, 11:28 AM
 
58,996 posts, read 27,280,292 times
Reputation: 14269
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePage View Post
It is about balance, folks !
Why not elect a Navajo, a Chippewa or a Dakota President?
Just asking
The left is too sold on (fill in the blank) American.

We should elect the BEST AMERICAN for the job. PERIOD.
 
Old 02-12-2015, 11:31 AM
 
Location: Southeast, where else?
3,913 posts, read 5,227,961 times
Reputation: 5824
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePage View Post
It is about balance, folks !
Why not elect a Navajo, a Chippewa or a Dakota President?
Just asking
While we continue to explore the "Village People" for candidates, why not a black/Hispanic, handicapped, Jewish/Muslim/Hindi/Cantonese, non-educated, foreigner from Estonia with limited English speaking abilities just to continue how understanding we are no matter the cost???

I mean hey, look how good we made out with the last change?
 
Old 02-12-2015, 11:33 AM
 
Location: Phoenix
2,616 posts, read 2,397,901 times
Reputation: 2416
My vote is for Two Dogs Fracking
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top