Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Would you vote for a single (unmarried) president?
Yes 42 100.00%
No 0 0%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-24-2015, 11:12 PM
 
642 posts, read 1,113,292 times
Reputation: 508

Advertisements

Assuming the said candidate is your best option, would you vote for them if they happened to be single?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-25-2015, 12:19 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,794 posts, read 40,990,020 times
Reputation: 62169
Quote:
Originally Posted by abqpsychlist View Post
Assuming the said candidate is your best option, would you vote for them if they happened to be single?
Sure as long as they aren't atheist or, you know, liberal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2015, 01:55 AM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,733,041 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by abqpsychlist View Post
Assuming the said candidate is your best option, would you vote for them if they happened to be single?
Dunno why this would be an issue to any except a very small percentage of american voters.

I'm interested in a candidate's policy stances, not her/his marital status.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2015, 01:56 AM
 
35,095 posts, read 51,212,218 times
Reputation: 62667
Quote:
Originally Posted by abqpsychlist View Post
Assuming the said candidate is your best option, would you vote for them if they happened to be single?

There have been single Presidents before so I don't see why it would be an issue now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2015, 02:01 AM
 
74 posts, read 98,709 times
Reputation: 119
Why not?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2015, 04:29 AM
 
Location: Miami, FL
8,087 posts, read 9,832,165 times
Reputation: 6650
I would vote for anyone who could actually lead us out of the mess we are in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2015, 04:31 AM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,212 posts, read 22,344,773 times
Reputation: 23848
There were two bachelor Presidents. Grover Cleveland and James Buchanan. One, John Tyler, was widowed and married for a second time while in office.

The First Lady's job as official hostess for the nation is a pretty big one. Just running the White House is big. While I don't think a First Lady has to be a wife to do the job, I think the White House always needs a hostess-in-charge. Cleveland selected his sister Rose for the job. 2 years into his first term he married his wife Frances, who was quite a beauty and much younger than he. It was an unusual marriage, even by today's standards. Cleveland was the executor of Frances' father's estate, and supervised her upbringing after her father's death. She was a college student when they married.

Cleveland was the only President to serve 2 terms non-consecutively. He is the only President who is always counted twice in the list of Presidents.

Buchanan was the one-term President who served before Lincoln, and was the reason Lincoln left the Whig party and joined the Republican party. Buchanan was a Democrat, and defeated the first Whig candidate, John C. Fremont, 4 years before Lincoln decided to run.

Sex and politics is nothing new. Cleveland was the heaviest President ever, weighing in at around 300 pounds, but his weight never held him back; he was a Sheriff, a Mayor, and the Governor of New York before becoming President, and was well known as a lady's man. He fathered a child out of wedlock, a charge that was used against him in his first campaign, and while he never married the mother, paid child support for the child's lifetime.

The election of 1884 had sexual and morality charges flung at both candidates. Cleveland was a Democrat. The Republican, James Blaine, had a reputation for doing shady deals and was widely seen as being a corrupt crook. Sort of like the Romney video, during the campaign a letter turned up exposing Blaine's back door dealings with a couple of railroad barons. The last line of the letter read "Burn this letter!"
At his stump speeches, Blaine's opponents would all yell in unison "Burn this letter!" and in the end, the voters chose the skirt-chaser over the inside dealer.

James Buchanan was alcoholic and is widely believed to have been homosexual. His closest companion was a man, William Rufus King. They shared the Presidential quarters in the White House during his term, while his niece Harriet Lane filled the hostess duties. King was widely called "Mrs. Buchanan" all over Washington at the time, and the White House staff's letters from the time claim he was often a cross-dresser during after hours while living in the White House. King was nicknamed 'Aunt Fancy', another term that was heard all over Washington.

Buchanan's reputation is the worst of any President. He's widely condemned for fanning the divisions that led to the south's secession, which began in his last weeks as President. During his single term, he declared war on the Utah territory and the Kansas border war broke out. A national panic, the term for a financial depression, also occurred in his term. All escalated the already deep devisions in Congress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2015, 04:58 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,672,365 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by abqpsychlist View Post
Assuming the said candidate is your best option, would you vote for them if they happened to be single?
Of course, why not? What does being married have to do with what kind of a President a person would be?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2015, 06:36 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
99,499 posts, read 4,489,231 times
Reputation: 9474
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
Of course, why not? What does being married have to do with what kind of a President a person would be?
Because being single flies in the face of good ole Republican family values that they preach about? They prefer a good family man:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/08/us...ford.html?_r=0
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2015, 06:26 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,317 posts, read 22,375,727 times
Reputation: 18436
If that person is a Republican, hell no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:43 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top