U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-07-2015, 06:11 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
66,519 posts, read 33,809,529 times
Reputation: 14252

Advertisements

Rand is the only potential runner, to get close to Hilary.

Polling out this morning, heard it on FOX News.





On a side note, Rand out polls Hill, in Pennsylvania and Colorado.
Rand Paul leads Hillary Clinton 47-44 in Colorado | Rare

Pennsylvania polling has Rand Paul ahead of Hillary in 2016 - Watchdog.org
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-07-2015, 06:17 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,330 posts, read 19,547,612 times
Reputation: 18436
It's too early to start this nonsense again, isn't it? jesus christ

Paul won't even be the GOP nominee, not a chance in hell. 47-45, 3% MOE? Let's stick with reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 08:02 AM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,357 posts, read 7,710,249 times
Reputation: 7272
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusNexus View Post
It's too early to start this nonsense again, isn't it? jesus christ

Paul won't even be the GOP nominee, not a chance in hell. 47-45, 3% MOE? Let's stick with reality.
Someone sounds a little angry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 08:18 AM
Status: "Trump: Inept, Incompetent, Insecure" (set 7 days ago)
 
10,519 posts, read 6,208,742 times
Reputation: 7245
I see just now that Randal Howard Paul has announced (online) that he is running for President, and that he will speak at noon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 08:29 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
7,215 posts, read 7,913,539 times
Reputation: 7740
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
Someone sounds a little angry.
Some of us can think back to past election campaigns beyond the past week.

You were probably one of the people who said Romney would win a landslide victory in 2012.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 10:14 AM
 
Location: Stasis
15,837 posts, read 10,043,104 times
Reputation: 8548
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusNexus View Post
It's too early to start this nonsense again, isn't it? jesus christ

Paul won't even be the GOP nominee, not a chance in hell. 47-45, 3% MOE? Let's stick with reality.
Such a waste of time and campaign money. At the end of the day it will be Jeb Bush.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 10:32 AM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,357 posts, read 7,710,249 times
Reputation: 7272
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaseMan View Post
Some of us can think back to past election campaigns beyond the past week.

You were probably one of the people who said Romney would win a landslide victory in 2012.
And you were one of the people who was certain that Scott Walker would be recalled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 10:44 AM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,832 posts, read 5,849,630 times
Reputation: 3404
It all comes down to who can afford to buy the nomination with campaign funds. Jeb Bush is the GOP golden boy and will get the nomination unfortunately. I too would really like to see Paul get the nomination and I think he has the potential to beat Clinton, but he has to get the nomination first, and I don't see it happening.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 10:47 AM
 
4,814 posts, read 3,269,382 times
Reputation: 1112
Considering all the other polls which have not been accurate, i.e., the latest one - Israel's election showing Netanyahu losing. I don't pay attention to polls.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 10:49 AM
 
12,639 posts, read 7,318,821 times
Reputation: 7449
Rand isn't my first choice, but I would probably vote for him over Hillary. His foreign policy positions concern me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top