Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Not that to many of the other candidates are shining example of having morals and ethics, but do you think Hillary can win with all the lies already out there and her behavior over the last years?
To me, she has displayed neither morals or ethics by her behavior.
She's going to get at lest 40% because there are enough brain dead leftists that would vote for her if she was a well known ax murderer. She just has to build on the base with the uninformed herd who respond to promises of free everything.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,300 posts, read 54,222,946 times
Reputation: 40623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wanderer0101
She's going to get at lest 40% because there are enough brain dead leftists that would vote for her if she was a well known ax murderer. She just has to build on the base with the uninformed herd who respond to promises of free everything.
And the party hack put up to oppose her oughta give her at least another 20%, eh?
If money bought Presidents, then Mitt Romney would be planning on running for re-election.
Becoming President of the United Sates does take big money now, but the person always wins or loses as a person, despite the money that was spent.
Morals and ethics are what anyone makes of them. One person's opinions, or 3 million's opinions, as to what constitutes "moral' and "ethical" aren't enough to win an election.
I doubt any of the declared candidates are going to run on a platform of morals and ethics. Everyone has a skeleton in the closet after all, and we have seen over and over just how far self-declared righteousness goes in Presidential campaigns.
If morals and ethics were ever going to be winners, then we would have seen a President Robertson or a President Huckabee by now.
The turd known as Hillary has survived (and some would say thrived) well into her 60s without ethics and morals.
She's the worst of human beings --- corrupt, unethical, underhand, deceitful, and amoral -- and those are likely her good points.
You left out booger eater.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
