Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-27-2015, 09:27 AM
 
13,302 posts, read 7,867,855 times
Reputation: 2144

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
Hilllary's sign simply means to move forward, not to the right.
Ever play pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-27-2015, 09:33 AM
 
13,302 posts, read 7,867,855 times
Reputation: 2144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aunt Maude View Post
That symbol represents her pumping money into Wall Street.

Meet the new boss...etc
Back in the day, she was trying to dump Social Security and all health care into Wall Street.

The plan was to then governmentize Wall Street.

Republicans to this day love her for that.

They're all a buncha fascists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2015, 10:38 AM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,630,499 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by triple8s View Post
Thanks for caring who I vote for but it's none of your business. I have the right to independently evaluate each candidate and vote for the person/party based on what I think, not what I'm told to think. I'm not part of a herd that needs to be cared for and pointed in a direction. I also have the right to choose not to vote.

Obviously you don't understand that the "new jobs" that are being created, the majority of them are part-time. Eliminate one full time job, create two "new jobs". They must be paying really well because there are many people holding down 2 or 3 of those part time jobs just to get by.

Jobs lost? Well I know of a president that wiped out the manufacturing sector and put a big hurt on the middle class. Jobs lost started with a little thing called NAFTA. Hint: He's a democrat. And if you can figure out who he is, you might know that he regrets ever signing it because of the negative impact it had on the US. Who gained from it? The economies of China and India.

Let me point you in another direction: south. US companies are pulling out of China and setting up manufacturing plants right in your neighbor's backyard. Cheap labor.

How about that national debt thingy? How's that doing? Up $7.4 trillion since Obama took office. That's how it's doing.
But more jobs were created when Clinton was president than when Bush came later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2015, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,630,499 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Horse ****!

The party of the president is incidental.


Not only do deficits shrink when Republicans control both houses of Congress, but unemployment continually declines as long as they are in charge.


From January 1995 through December 2000, unemployment declined from 5.6% to 3.9%, and from January 2003 through December 2006 unemployment declined from 5.8% to 4.4%.

http://uspolitics.about.com/od/usgov...division_2.htm

US Misery Index - Custom Index by Month

http://www.davemanuel.com/history-of...ted-states.php


Even Clinton and Bush couldn`t ********** up.
Nevertheless, except for Carter, you can't run from the fact that the economy performs better with more jobs created when a Democrat is president.

If it so important to the Republicans not to have a deficit then Bush should have vetoed efforts to run up the deficit when he was president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2015, 10:43 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
But more jobs were created when Clinton was president than when Bush came later.
Thats because under Bush we had pretty much full employment until the economic crash.

You cant create more jobs than there are people to fill them. Its impossible.

And lets not even discuss that Clinton opposed those policies which lead to job creations. he fought kicking and screaming against them, even shut down the government..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2015, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Huntsville, AL
2,852 posts, read 1,612,989 times
Reputation: 5446
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.C. Ogilvy View Post
Obama has not announced his candidacy.
Don't you mean HER candidacy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2015, 10:47 AM
 
78,385 posts, read 60,566,039 times
Reputation: 49654
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
Nevertheless, except for Carter, you can't run from the fact that the economy performs better with more jobs created when a Democrat is president.

If it so important to the Republicans not to have a deficit then Bush should have vetoed efforts to run up the deficit when he was president.
Bush learned from his father that the American people are largely stupid and that being fiscally responsible turns you into a one-term president.

Clinton rode both a stock market bubble and a consumer debt bubble economy so Bush took over and rode a housing bubble economy to stave off the popping of Clinton's bubbles....and then Obama inherited the hangover of both of them (and some guys before that as well.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2015, 10:48 AM
 
1,701 posts, read 1,108,086 times
Reputation: 711
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
But more jobs were created when Clinton was president than when Bush came later.
And..........................is that your response? LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2015, 11:28 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,531,346 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.C. Ogilvy View Post
Hillary Clinton has apparently given up on winning the 2016 Presidential election. Sure, she will be the Dems nominee, but how can anyone take a leftist seriously when her campaign logo consists of her initial and an arrow pointing right?


http://www.newyorker.com/wp-content/...illary-690.jpg

Come back in mid November, 2016.

We'll talk.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2015, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,218 posts, read 22,357,274 times
Reputation: 23853
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.C. Ogilvy View Post
Hillary Clinton has apparently given up on winning the 2016 Presidential election. Sure, she will be the Dems nominee, but how can anyone take a leftist seriously when her campaign logo consists of her initial and an arrow pointing right?


http://www.newyorker.com/wp-content/...illary-690.jpg
Try hard not to be ridiculous. Making a claim like this is obvious nonsense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top