Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-25-2015, 12:15 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,336,576 times
Reputation: 7990

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unsettomati View Post
You're projecting, because that is what you do.

I'm not 'intrigued' by Bush as the Republican nominee - I can just read polls, track institutional support, and follow the track-record of the modern nominating process of the Republican Party. That's it. That points to Jeb Bush as the 2016 nominee. Beyond that, I suspect that Bush would be one of the better Republican candidates, your paranoid 'they just think he would be easy to beat' fixation notwithstanding. I think Rubio might be a better candidate (though there's a lot of unknown there, so he might not be) and I think Kasich likely would be better. Kasich is also my preferred Republican nominee, because I'd like the GOP to nominate the candidate I'd most like to have as President of a Republican wins. If I really played the game of rooting for easy to beat candidates, I'd be cheering Trump (well, I am, but not seriously) and Cruz and Santorum and various other disasters currently in the clown car.

Despite all the evidence to the contrary, you made post after post downplaying the likelihood of a Clinton Presidential bid.
http://www.city-data.com/forum/36359934-post9.html
http://www.city-data.com/forum/35854447-post18.html
http://www.city-data.com/forum/35681236-post20.html
http://www.city-data.com/forum/35345641-post14.html
http://www.city-data.com/forum/34815157-post158.html
http://www.city-data.com/forum/34097232-post10.html
http://www.city-data.com/forum/32753529-post13.html
http://www.city-data.com/forum/32242072-post65.html
http://www.city-data.com/forum/30074356-post34.html
http://www.city-data.com/forum/30011574-post1.html

I stopped at ten, but not because I ran out of such posts by you. By the way, I love the last one, where - after once again convincing yourself (and pretty much no one else) that Clinton won't run in 2016, you assert that the Democratic nominee will be... Michelle Obama...

And why? Because you just loathe the notion of a Republican facing Clinton. There is no other logical explanation for your serial wrongness about her running. All you see is what you want to see. And everything you dislike, you just dismiss as a creation of your liberal boogeyman.
WOW! Talk about too much time on one's hands....

Yes, I did not expect that Hillary would run. And there is an explanation for it apart from your failed attempt at mind reading over the internet. She will be 69 when election day rolls around. She has maybe $100 million in the bank, a new grandchild, a mansion in NY, and a mansion in Georgetown. After the 2008 campaign she complained that she was sick of 20 hour days. She has 30 years of baggage going back to AR days that she knows is all going to be dredged up in a 2012 campaign. She has had recent health problems. Putting myself in those shoes, I would have opted not to run. It turns out that I was wrong.

Anyway, this thread is about Jeb Bush, not Hillary. I don't think that Jeb Bush will make it through the GOP primaries. It is possible that I will be proven wrong, just as I was w/ Hillary. But just remember all the problems Romney had in 2012 with one after another 'not Romney' climbing to the top, only to self-implode. This time around Jeb will be facing less ragtag competition that will be less likely to self-implode.

Just read through some of the threads in this forum. It is consistently liberal posters who seem to relish the idea of Jeb Bush as GOP nominee. Conservative posters are tepid at best.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-25-2015, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,553,024 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM05 View Post
Also, you may know Kristol was in the 'Inner Circle' of Dubya Bush's campaign in 2000. He knows the Bush clan well. Kristol stated on FOXNewsSunday few weeks ago that both Jeb and Hillary are ''phony populist's'' and would NEVER be elected prez.

Like Hillary, the Bush reputation regarding character, (the lack of) is on the Bottom of the scale.
Of course I am aware of Kristol's connection with the Bush's. I am probably more aware than a lot of people are. Now, as for the reputation of Jeb, I am not going to discuss that because I have no idea, but I doubt it is anything like Hillary's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2015, 03:28 PM
 
2,345 posts, read 1,668,165 times
Reputation: 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
Of course I am aware of Kristol's connection with the Bush's. I am probably more aware than a lot of people are. Now, as for the reputation of Jeb, I am not going to discuss that because I have no idea, but I doubt it is anything like Hillary's.

Whatever. Kristol is right about Both Jeb and Illary - Both are Phony Populist's and neither NEVER will become POTUSA. But, that's very little consolation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2015, 06:48 PM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,708,912 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post

Just read through some of the threads in this forum. It is consistently liberal posters who seem to relish the idea of Jeb Bush as GOP nominee. Conservative posters are tepid at best.
Well, this liberal is pretty tepid on bush as well.

But tepidness (tepidity?) *is* a more positive emotion than what I feel about most of the other contenders, so in that sense, you have a point...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2015, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Coastal Georgia
50,237 posts, read 63,758,765 times
Reputation: 93030
I didn't read the article, but I don't think it will be Bush either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top