Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: How Will Bernie Reduce the Federal Debt?
Just look at the pictures that Bernie posts on Facebook! 14 93.33%
I'm willing to explain this in great depth. 1 6.67%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-09-2015, 01:55 PM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,443,819 times
Reputation: 6960

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
If economic growth increases faster than the deficit increases, the debt, as a p% of GDP, keeps getting smaller. A $20 trillion debt in a $200 trillion economy, is chicken feed. The economy can absorb that easily. This is just math folks.
economic growth is NOT increasing, it's DECREASING! How does it increase with more and more jobs being lost, especially the high paying ones and our economy depends on people having disposable income to spend? How? It doesn't. It's just math folks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-09-2015, 02:49 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,869 posts, read 26,503,175 times
Reputation: 25768
Quote:
Originally Posted by westboundrambler View Post
Where's option C? Which would be "Do your own god damned research and understand basic economic principles".
Exactly how do you research Santa Claus? He is a work of fiction. Just like Sander's "plan".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2015, 03:00 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,170 posts, read 19,194,865 times
Reputation: 14896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dequindre View Post
It's not my job to research Bernie's economic plans (which I'm sure are quite ghastly). I only hear empty phrases from Sanders fans, so I'd like to hear a detailed explanation for once. Saying that people and corporations "need to pay their fair share" over and over again is as bad as Trump saying "I'll just get it done".
Better to be an uninformed voter? Bernie is not shy. YT is absolutely full of clips of him speaking on every issue under the sun for the last 20 years. Punch in what you want to know and get educated.

BTW - If you don't make over $400,000 a year you probably won't have to worry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2015, 03:03 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,170 posts, read 19,194,865 times
Reputation: 14896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones View Post
What? A debt never paid isn't irrelevant, it is STILL owed! Are you saying that we can just keep borrowing money with no intentions of ever paying it back? Really? You do know that wars start over that right?
That's how Trump made his billions. Maybe there's something to it...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2015, 04:03 PM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,624,120 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
We never defaulted on the debt. I don't know what makes you think that we did.

But economic growth has made the WWII debt, of $220 billion, which was 120% of GDP at the time, completely irrelevant compared to the size of the economy.
You are word smithing. Money printed prior to 1971 was backed by real assets because each $ printed could still be redeemed for either silver (domestically) or gold (internationally). Furthermore GDP was calculated differently in 1945 than it is now so the comparison is for naught.

After Nixon defaulted on the debt in 1971, by halting owed gold redemptions (mainly to France) we went 100% fiat. It's just numbers in a computer now. This is why that 98% of the national debt has been run up since then. It's not mathematically impossible to pay back. When the interest on the debt exceeds the ability of the taxpayers to cover, is when the fun begins.

They will have to default on the USD represented by FRNs. They will have no choice.

(BTW, $220B of debt run up by 5 years of world war, now represents about 1/2 of government spending.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2015, 04:23 PM
 
4,081 posts, read 3,605,028 times
Reputation: 1235
Quote:
Originally Posted by westboundrambler View Post
Well what's more important? An imaginary number or peoples livelihood?
Debt is not imaginary. If it is, I suggest you donate your entire income to the Sanders campaign. Let's see how well that would work out for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2015, 04:25 PM
 
4,081 posts, read 3,605,028 times
Reputation: 1235
I asked a simple question, yet Sanders fans can't even answer it.

Once again, the Sanders fan stereotypes are proving to be true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2015, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,947,200 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones View Post
What you seem to fail to understand that the servicing on the debt will continue to increase and in order to pay that so we DON'T default taxes will have to continue to increase while we lose more and more jobs and pay scale. THAT is how it ruins livelihoods. Pretty soon they will need 100% of everyone's money just to pay the debt payment.
You should look at the math.

If GDP grows at 3% per year and the deficit grows by 2% per year, then tax revenue, which is typically about 18% of GDP will always increase faster than the interest on the debt. Oh, by the way, even though debt has doubled interest is about the same over the last few years.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2015, 07:46 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,947,200 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
You are word smithing. Money printed prior to 1971 was backed by real assets because each $ printed could still be redeemed for either silver (domestically) or gold (internationally).
What makes you think that shiny metals have intrinsic values? Money is what people will give you in exchange for it. The whole world is willing to give products and services (real assets) for those dollars. They are acknowledging that our money has value. All is needed is the full faith and credit of the United States.

Moreover, the U.S. dollar floats on world markets and is priced in comparison to other currencies. That establishes how much the dollar is worth to foreigners. Also, no other currency is set to gold or silver anymore. That's an archaic method of valuing money.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Furthermore GDP was calculated differently in 1945 than it is now so the comparison is for naught.
That's unimportant. The U.S. still ran up $220 billion by the end of World War II when the GDP was less than that, however you calculate it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
After Nixon defaulted on the debt in 1971, by halting owed gold redemptions (mainly to France) we went 100% fiat. It's just numbers in a computer now. This is why that 98% of the national debt has been run up since then. It's not mathematically impossible to pay back. When the interest on the debt exceeds the ability of the taxpayers to cover, is when the fun begins.
It sure seems like the economy and people have done really well since 1971.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
They will have to default on the USD represented by FRNs. They will have no choice.
The government has an unlimited ability to create money. As long as one has a sovereign currency, there is never a need to default.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
(BTW, $220B of debt run up by 5 years of world war, now represents about 1/2 of government spending.)
Expenditures today are just shy of $4 trillion. $220 billion is not half of spending. In 1950, government spending was $44.8 billion so the debt of $220 billion was five times government spending. GDP was $300.2 billion.

How did we pay it off? We didn't. It's just that as GDP rose, $220 billion in debt was smaller and smaller compared to the size of the economy. It's something like someone who graduated college with a $5,000 student loan debt. That number might seem large compared to that person's first job, but as their income rises year-after-year, $5,000 becomes incidental.

Last edited by MTAtech; 10-09-2015 at 08:00 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2015, 09:57 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by westboundrambler View Post
It's not your "job". But you're asking a question that can literally be answered from 10 minutes of research.
I have yet to hear the answer either.. since you posted this a long, long time ago, far more than 10 minutes has gone bye, can you please provide us with the answer?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top