U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-27-2015, 12:14 PM
 
Location: Kansas
19,185 posts, read 15,027,476 times
Reputation: 18249

Advertisements

Since other endorsements are coming up here, I thought endorsement from the porn industry would be "interesting". Forbes Welcome

I mean, who doesn't want to vote for "porn" friendly candidate?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-27-2015, 12:17 PM
 
4,541 posts, read 865,416 times
Reputation: 2120
Of course they're going to endorse the liberals and those with no morals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2015, 12:26 PM
 
25,630 posts, read 30,437,921 times
Reputation: 23112
Yup Hildabeast and Dems they are also getting the underage sex trade voting bloc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2015, 12:27 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,053 posts, read 29,528,523 times
Reputation: 7830
The better question is how many people who claim things like porn is "no morals" watches porn?

I wouldn't want to vote for candidates that are seen as regressive and take it upon themselves to try to force their idea of morals onto others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2015, 12:29 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
33,302 posts, read 20,110,179 times
Reputation: 13012
lol

exactly, who doesn't want to vote for "porn" friendly candidate?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2015, 12:39 PM
 
32,532 posts, read 30,665,435 times
Reputation: 32348
Who the heck decides to vote for someone based on the porn endorsement? Or is Rubio counting on that punching up his numbers?

Porn is HUGE in the Bible Belt..... Lol.....I guess that's one way to tap a demographic. Go for the porn vote in the South.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2015, 01:12 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 9,079,188 times
Reputation: 9304
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
The better question is how many people who claim things like porn is "no morals" watches porn?

I wouldn't want to vote for candidates that are seen as regressive and take it upon themselves to try to force their idea of morals onto others.
The precise size of the United States pornography industry is unclear. Estimates from a low of 3 billion to a high of 12 billion because just like illegal immigration no one knows. There is no way to accurately account for all segments of the industry. You can be sure that Dem, GOP and Independents are all among those who have seen or watched porn in some form.

So if Nina Hartley( who has played Hillary in films ) was Hillary's pick for VP that would fall inline with your moral compass ? I can see how that might energize the base to have a doppelganger for VP.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nina_Hartley

According to Hartley, Hillary is “a corporate Democrat” and “a creature of the Machine, as well as a Clinton, so I don’t expect her to be a Girl Scout.

I agree Hillary is no girl scout. Sanders gave away all her cookies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2015, 01:37 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 9,079,188 times
Reputation: 9304
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyflower3191981 View Post
lol

exactly, who doesn't want to vote for "porn" friendly candidate?
I don't believe it is a major consideration but a president that has a satisfied sex life would be better than one that doesn't. Bill Clinton kind of broke the ice with sex in the White House. If he gets back into the White House no doubt his "Toga Parties" will be invitation only events with the private speeches for donors. Hopefully it will be in the distant future before we see the Roman Orgies spilling out the front door onto the front lawn of the White House. But I'm sure Hillary can explain that away. She is the best at damage control so we are told.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2015, 02:39 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,053 posts, read 29,528,523 times
Reputation: 7830
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
The precise size of the United States pornography industry is unclear. Estimates from a low of 3 billion to a high of 12 billion because just like illegal immigration no one knows. There is no way to accurately account for all segments of the industry. You can be sure that Dem, GOP and Independents are all among those who have seen or watched porn in some form.

So if Nina Hartley( who has played Hillary in films ) was Hillary's pick for VP that would fall inline with your moral compass ? I can see how that might energize the base to have a doppelganger for VP.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nina_Hartley

According to Hartley, Hillary is “a corporate Democrat” and “a creature of the Machine, as well as a Clinton, so I don’t expect her to be a Girl Scout.

I agree Hillary is no girl scout. Sanders gave away all her cookies.
What are you babbling on about?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2015, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Tampa, FL
27,798 posts, read 26,217,684 times
Reputation: 14611
Quote:
Originally Posted by DewDropInn View Post
Who the heck decides to vote for someone based on the porn endorsement?
someone concerned about First Amendment rights being taken away by the gov't? just guessing here.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top