Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Additionally, TIME reported, an archivist at the university came to the same conclusion earlier this year, but has thus far been unable to identify the man. For that reason, Sanders is still listed in the description. The classmates with whom TIME spoke believe the man addressing protesters in the photo is Bruce Rappaport, who passed away in 2006.
With the photo quality if the group photo, I just really couldn't bet either way and unless you are suspected of being a "pathological" liar, I'd give you the benefit of the doubt. Just because classmates say something from 50 years ago................
With the photo quality if the group photo, I just really couldn't bet either way and unless you are suspected of being a "pathological" liar, I'd give you the benefit of the doubt. Just because classmates say something from 50 years ago................
Ben Carson didn't get off that easy with our Liberal friends. I think it's time to return the favor.
Other people that were there said that the two were co founders of the group, and looked remarkably similar. They have also said that Sanders was there at the sit in. Maybe the wrong one was labeled in the photo as the one standing in front, maybe not. But bothwere in attendance and both were leaders.
Ben Carson didn't get off that easy with our Liberal friends. I think it's time to return the favor.
Carson's claims were pretty far fetched. Seems this has been labelled as Sanders for a long time.
Should Sanders be more careful if this wasn't him? (And that isn't clear yet) absolutely but it would seem to be a valid error as its something Sanders was known for in college.
Quite unlike Carson being a thug that would go around and stab someone.
Other people that were there said that the two were co founders of the group, and looked remarkably similar. They have also said that Sanders was there at the sit in. Maybe the wrong one was labeled in the photo as the one standing in front, maybe not. But bothwere in attendance and both were leaders.
No, Sanders claims that he is valiantly standing up there for the sake of civil rights. As it turns out, he wasn't standing there leading at all.
No, Sanders claims that he is valiantly standing up there for the sake of civil rights. As it turns out, he wasn't standing there leading at all.
He was the co founder of the group and was in attendance at the sit in. The guy standing up looks like a known pic of Sanders even wearing the same sweater. People who knew both of them said that the two co founders look remarkably similar. He was a LEADER of the group, he was there at the sit in. So, yes he was valiantly leading them.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
