Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Clinton issued a troubling call to arms for the nation's tech companies and government to join forces against encrypted private communications
You might imagine that Clinton — of all people — would be sensitive to the liberty interests of hiding personal communications from prying eyes. This is the public servant, after all, who as secretary of state maintained a private email server — with the benefit to Clinton of being able to vet and delete her own communications before they became a permanent part of the public record.
Clinton said, "I would hope that, given the extraordinary capacities that the tech community has and the legitimate needs and questions from law enforcement, that there could be a Manhattan-like project — something that would bring the government and the tech communities together to see they're not adversaries, they've got to be partners."
Seems our Government wants a "Police State." They want to run the Country and use as as workers and herd us like sheep. They want to outnumber us with illegal aliens and imported potential Terrorists until we don't make a difference anymore. Voting for Hillary is a vote for Obama again.
They funny thing about that, is that not one of them ever says why you should vote for Hillary. Instead, it's always why you shouldn't vote for her opponent.
The fact that she even has supporters boggles the mind.
Does that mind boggling also apply to the Republicans, nearly all of whom are on record supporting defeating encryption and violating Americans' privacy?
Paul, Sanders, and maybe Cruz are the only ones who appear to have any respect at all for privacy.
Does that mind boggling also apply to the Republicans, nearly all of whom are on record supporting defeating encryption and violating Americans' privacy?
Paul, Sanders, and maybe Cruz are the only ones who appear to have any respect at all for privacy.
I don't see why it wouldn't. Not all of us are partisan hacks on this board.
Why does anyone care what some treasonous coward hiding out in Russia has to say?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
