Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So every candidate and every president has ordered their top aides to strip classified labeling off of classified documents and transmit these documents across insecure channels.
You cannot support the suggestion that even one other high level candidate has ever done this, other than Hillary, much less that "all" of them have.
Talking points. No one ordered anyone to strip classified labeling off of TALKING POINTS.
Talking points. No one ordered anyone to strip classified labeling off of TALKING POINTS.
Apparently they were classified talking points. The fact that they were "talking points" does not make them any less covered by national security laws.
Apparently they were classified talking points. The fact that they were "talking points" does not make them any less covered by national security laws.
Generally, talking points are points that an official plans to talk about with the public. Hardly classified. And I can find nothing anywhere that says the talking points were classified.
Generally, talking points are points that an official plans to talk about with the public. Hardly classified. And I can find nothing anywhere that says the talking points were classified.
Nope. There is nothing that dictates that the audience must be the pubic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge
Prove that these talking points were classified. PROOF. Reality bites.
Will Hillary rely on mental illness as a defense when charged ? Will Obama pardon her so she can keep running for office ? Will the A.G. Lynch offer her a reduced sentence in a plea bargain and donate to her legal fund ? Will Bill visit her in the pokey ? Will she get a jury of her peers ?
This is a story that will never go away until she is defending herself in court.
Nope. There is nothing that dictates that the audience must be the pubic.Prove they weren't. It's your claim.
The ball is on your side of the court. It is impossible to prove a negative. The affirmative argument that you are making is that the talking points were classified. Prove it.
The ball is on your side of the court. It is impossible to prove a negative. The affirmative argument that you are making is that the talking points were classified. Prove it.
You said.....
Talking points. No one ordered anyone to strip classified labeling off of TALKING POINTS.
Talking points. No one ordered anyone to strip classified labeling off of TALKING POINTS.
You can't prove this. Case closed.
Couldn't prove it anyway. Logically, it is IMPOSSIBLE to prove a negative. Which is what you keep asking people to do, over and over. Which is why it falls on YOU, the person with the affirmative argument, to proffer proof. You are claiming that the talking points were classified. That's an affirmative argument. Prove it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
