Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
When you think about it, the Democratic and Republican parties have a lot in common. They both use similar tactics, promote people who say they want what's best for the people without really knowing what's best for the people, and put more emphasis on charisma and charm than content of character.
I am beginning to believe that we, as a nation are heading toward a one-party system. This won't come to fruition overnight (and hopefully never will), but the possibility is there.
What say you?
Last edited by CornerstoneEagle04; 02-05-2008 at 10:30 PM..
Reason: Spacing
Yes there a major differences within the parties, but I see a message that the PEOPLE are forcing change somewhat. I covered this in the poll I had posted.
Cannot yet put a finger on it but I believe there is a movement of people forcing changes to be more towards the middle.
The parties themselves and the elected officals seem to have not realized that its the people who run the country and not them.
I guess I am the one who doesn't see a difference between the two parties anymore. They used to be really opposite but now they are pretty much the same with one leaning more right and the other leaning more left but basically have the same ideals.... corruption...
Yes there a major differences within the parties, but I see a message that the PEOPLE are forcing change somewhat. I covered this in the poll I had posted.
Cannot yet put a finger on it but I believe there is a movement of people forcing changes to be more towards the middle.
The parties themselves and the elected officals seem to have not realized that its the people who run the country and not them.
If you look at the candidates from the late 1940's through the late 1970's, you'll see candidates and Congressional and Senate leaders who weren't that different in political view. This changed substantially thanks to Reagan and Gingrich, and we had a lot more friction and differences, a postive discussion and evaluation in my view. I think that we have some narrowing of the difference again, although perhaps not back to the days of Jacob Javits, Hugh Scott, Birch Bayh and Henry Jackson.
There aren't really two parties. There are just two wings of the one Washington Party. The so-called differences between them are used to keep people busy debating things as a distraction. Meanwhile, the Democrats and the Republicans work together quietly behind the scenes for their real agenda: money and power.
I think the one party would be Special Interest. Both Dems and Republicans are bending over for them and not us. There is a great grassroots movement called GOOOH (get out of our house) to try and take back the house. I would be so happy if the people we elected would have enough of a moral compass to not go back on their promises the minute they go to DC.
I have heard them referred to as "the right and left wings of the American Property Party" (Utah Phiollips). Both are more concerned with protecting existing wealth and both are disinterested in expanding the economy to allow the lower income levels to ever accumulate anything but debt.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.