Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-22-2016, 01:20 PM
 
11,755 posts, read 7,111,606 times
Reputation: 8011

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
Sanders vs Trump would be a commie versus a fascist.
More like Paper White vs. Orange.

Mick
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-22-2016, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Florida
9,569 posts, read 5,617,651 times
Reputation: 12024
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
So in line with those who claim past elections predict future elections we have this.

After the amendment went into effect in 1945 that prevents a President from holding two terms, there has only been one case where a political party held the White House for more than 2 terms. This would be Reagan/Bush in 1988.

  • 1946 - DEM
  • 1952 - GOP
  • 1956 - GOP
  • 1960 - DEM
  • 1964 - DEM
  • 1968 - GOP
  • 1972 - GOP
  • 1976 - DEM
  • 1980 - GOP
  • 1984 - GOP
  • 1988 - GOP <----- 3 terms
  • 1992 - DEM
  • 1996 - DEM
  • 2000 - GOP <--------Selected by the Supreme Court & his brother Jeb!
  • 2004 - GOP
  • 2008 - DEM
  • 2012 - DEM
  • 2016 - ? <------ GOP due to history.
Ahem! Lest we forget what happened in 2000!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2016, 01:29 PM
 
11,755 posts, read 7,111,606 times
Reputation: 8011
Ah yes, historical patterns. They occur with 100% precision and that's why in some presidential election years, we simply don't bother with holding the election. That would be a waste of money and time.

2008: No Muslim Kenyan mulatto would ever be a POTUS!

Mick
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2016, 01:32 PM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,680,593 times
Reputation: 23295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobdreamz View Post
Ahem! Lest we forget what happened in 2000!


BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!!!!

Come on, its ok we all know you want to yell it at the top of your lungs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2016, 01:42 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,409,015 times
Reputation: 6288
Why did the OP start his count in 1946? To mask the fact that the Democrats won FIVE elections in a row? Yup.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2016, 01:50 PM
 
4,412 posts, read 3,957,230 times
Reputation: 2326
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
You contradict yourself.

  • You claim Obama has high approval rating. i.e. Ground Obama walks on turns to gold.
  • You dismiss Reagan as nobody beyond someone who makes America feel good about themselves. i.e. Bedtime for Bonzo was a Bozo.
  • So why is it that "high approval" Obama doesn't make America feel good? Electorate is angrier than it has ever been.
I don't think you made your case.
I didn't say the ground Obama walked on turned to gold, just simply refuting your assertion that "most americans think he's a terrible President." He's not perfect by annnnny stretch, but he's a far sight better than anyone currently running R or D.

Nor did I dismiss Reagan. Simply, he's only super duper awesome Saint Ronny in some reimagined version where you personally tears down the Berlin Wall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2016, 02:40 PM
 
52,433 posts, read 26,603,454 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobdreamz View Post
Ahem! Lest we forget what happened in 2000!
Forget what? Al Gore conceded the election to Bush.

Al Gore lost the state of Florida due to the Nader vote and Bush won the electoral votes. Gore BTW, blames his loss on the Clintons and not due to political malfeasance by Florida officials.

None of the conspiracy theories have held up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2016, 02:43 PM
 
52,433 posts, read 26,603,454 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
Why did the OP start his count in 1946? To mask the fact that the Democrats won FIVE elections in a row? Yup.
The reason is clearly stated in the OP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2016, 02:48 PM
 
52,433 posts, read 26,603,454 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Mon View Post
I didn't say the ground Obama walked on turned to gold, just simply refuting your assertion that "most americans think he's a terrible President." He's not perfect by annnnny stretch, but he's a far sight better than anyone currently running R or D.

Nor did I dismiss Reagan. Simply, he's only super duper awesome Saint Ronny in some reimagined version where you personally tears down the Berlin Wall.
His disapproval rating is in the mid to high 50s. His approval rating on the economy has been in the low 20s. By any measure, most Americans think he is doing a terrible job. On the other hand I support your right to believe anything you like about Obama.

In regards to Reagan, I only stated two facts. He did bring an end to the Cold War and it was a generally prosperous time compared to the 1970s. Was he perfect, nope. But in the future, Reagan will be remembered for having accomplished far more than Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2016, 03:15 PM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,125 posts, read 16,144,906 times
Reputation: 28333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogdad View Post
If you would vote for either Bernie or Clinton over Trump or any other Republican nominee, I'll repeat my sentiment.

I could careless if a person like you never votes for a Republican nominee again.
That makes no sense. If you can't get people like me to vote for Republicans in the future, along with Democrats and Independents who vote for Bernie or Hillary, the Republican Party might as well turn off the lights and lock the door. I'm sorry, there is no one running - no one - who I would not vote for over Trump. I have no desire for WWIII or the return of second class citizen status for non-white males.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.Moderator - Diabetes and Kentucky (including Lexington & Louisville)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top