Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
To all of you who know the details of the way the election process works, what really happens if Hillary were to win over Sanders in the primaries and then she gets indited? Does Bernie win by default?
The Pubs have been "investigating" Hill and making accusations of all kinds of horrible crimes for over 20 years.
As of today, the number of charges is zero. The number of indictments is zero.
The current FBI investigation will go nowhere. Both of her predecessors (Powell and Rice) used their private email and no one ever heard a squeak about it. Because they were serving as Republicans. This too will end up being just another GOP snipe hunt. But the Pubs love their never-ending fake scandals. It's what they do instead of their jobs when they have a majority in congress.
To all of you who know the details of the way the election process works, what really happens if Hillary were to win over Sanders in the primaries and then she gets indited? Does Bernie win by default?
If Hillary wins life will go on as usual also she wont be indicted as she's done nothing wrong.
To all of you who know the details of the way the election process works, what really happens if Hillary were to win over Sanders in the primaries and then she gets indited? Does Bernie win by default?
The U.S. is a democratic nation, which means we have a rule of law, which means that no matter how much conservatives hate Hillary Clinton, that turn make mistakes into indictable crimes.
We have also learned this week that all of the recent former Secretary of States have received classified information via their personal emails. (see: Rice aides, Powell got classified info on personal email accounts | Reuters) So, unless you are suggesting that the last 15 years of Secretary of States should be indicted, you are blowing smoke and this has nothing to so with "political elites" getting preferential treatment.
But I can understand conservative frustration, they can't compete in the presidential race against their candidates' outlandish policy proposals against either Democrats' thought out policies, so the only choice conservatives have is to keep shouting "BENGHAZI -- EMAILS -- BENGHAZI -- EMAILS!!!"
You are correct.
It is Hillary`s indictable crimes that turn her mistakes into indictable crimes.
Because for all the we are the "99%" talk, Democrats support political elites being above the law and above us plebeians.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech
The U.S. is a democratic nation, which means we have a rule of law, which means that no matter how much conservatives hate Hillary Clinton, that turn make mistakes into indictable crimes.
We have also learned this week that all of the recent former Secretary of States have received classified information via their personal emails. (see: Rice aides, Powell got classified info on personal email accounts | Reuters) So, unless you are suggesting that the last 15 years of Secretary of States should be indicted, you are blowing smoke and this has nothing to so with "political elites" getting preferential treatment.
But I can understand conservative frustration, they can't compete in the presidential race against their candidates' outlandish policy proposals against either Democrats' thought out policies, so the only choice conservatives have is to keep shouting "BENGHAZI -- EMAILS -- BENGHAZI -- EMAILS!!!"
Sorry, but you are being intellectually dishonest.
What is the difference between Hillary and Petraeus?
Part of his crime that he was punished for was keeping classified info improperly in his desk. Hillary not only kept classified info on an improperly protected private server, but the way she sent emails while abroad allowed Chinese phone companies to intercept what she sent.
You do support political elites being above the law of us plebeians - even if it harms our country - how is that not traitorous of you?
You should never claim that you stand for the 99% as you willfully support the 1% elites being above the law.
I am fine with going back and punishing any past secretary of states who would also be disqualified from being president if they pulled a Hillary.
While I am voting for Trump I would rather have Hillary win the primaries than Sanders. I am not blowing smoke and really want an answer to my question.....
You can look the info up on google, but you will have to spell it correctly to find the answer.
I suppose if she wins the nomination and is later indicted, the Dems will drag out Joe Biden or some other retread.
I'm getting a big kick out of the "she didn't do anything that others haven't done" crowd. Nothing more than rationalization. When you actually dig into the details, the facts are very different indeed. But hey, I have no problem with the FBI investigating past SOS if they feel national security was at risk.
I'm pretty certain that the FBI is NOT controlled by Republicans. Perhaps they are just doing this for the hell of it! Same as the State Department requesting records of the foundation. Time to face the facts! This woman is dishonest to her core and anyone who can't see that is either extremely naive, a hard-core partisan or just an old-fashioned idiot.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Don't get so far ahead of yourself
