Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-28-2016, 03:39 PM
 
30,058 posts, read 18,652,475 times
Reputation: 20862

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeyCNY View Post
Yeah, and remember: Hillary voters WILL NEVER vote for Obama, resulting in an overwhelming McCain landslide.

And also remember: There is OVERWHELMING evidence that Obama has a fake birth certificate, and Trump will reveal this evidence in October 2012, resulting in the eventual Romney landslide.

LOL. Don't teabaggers ever get sick and tired of their laughable "predictions"?
I am a conservative.

However, yes- I agree- predictions are worthless. I could understand the 2008 Obama victory, but was shocked by his 2012 victory. I am only good at telling what events will occur, long afer they have happened.

I personally thought there was NO WAY Obama would be elected to a second term, as he was (and is) a terrible POTUS. Obama is Jimmy Carter II; however, we have entered a phase in which:

1. 50% of the population is dependent on the feds

2. IQs are declining

3. we have a massive influx of uneducated, unskilled illegals

4. lack of "good paying" jobs (those have been exported, courtesy of Bill Clinton)

5. an oligarchy of bankers and trial lawyers has been installed, courtesy of federal policy

6. J-1 visa workers rob US citizens of jobs as a matter of course


Nearly ALL of these situations have been created by democrat policy. However, the dems are very adept at deflection and continue to label conservatives as the source of all of the nation's problems. Dems attempt to increase the number of poor, dependent citizens (to the detriment of the nation) to increase thier constituency and have been very effective in those goals..

Most Americans don't want to be poor and dependent. They look at the quick handouts the dems offer, much like an addict looking for the next "quick fix", rather than seeking a long term solution which provides for US manufacturing, control of the banking sector and the trial lawyers, an EPA that protects the environment, yet does not kill business, and a "USA first" policy which favors citizens over illegals.

As long as there are plenty of dependent idiots (and those numbers are increasing), there will always be dems/liberals looking to enslave citizens in exchange for a life of poverty and dependency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-28-2016, 04:49 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,521,957 times
Reputation: 24780
^^^

Just plain silly.
But amusing.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2016, 04:56 PM
 
Location: Arlington VA
549 posts, read 625,344 times
Reputation: 603
And yet, conservative red states are the ones dependent on welfare to survive, in the form of massive wealth redistribution from the wealthier blue state taxpayers.

And Trump hires illegal aliens and outsources his clothing line to Mexico and China. Trump SUPPORTS socialist healthcare (or at least used to).

I do agree on one thing, however: IQs are DEFINITELY declining. One look at the gimme-gimme-gimme Trump crowd is proof of this.

Last edited by MikeyCNY; 02-28-2016 at 05:04 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2016, 05:04 PM
 
30,058 posts, read 18,652,475 times
Reputation: 20862
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeyCNY View Post
And yet, conservative red states are the ones dependent on welfare to survive, in the form of massive wealth redistribution from the wealthier blue state taxpayers.

And Trump hires illegal aliens and outsources his clothing line to Mexico and China.

I do agree on one thing, however: IQs are DEFINITELY declining. One look at Trump supporters is proof of this.
Oh my goodness.................. the same liberal canard!

STATES don't recieve welfare, PEOPLE recieve welfare. The MAJORITY of those on welfare ARE DEMOCRATS. It has been shown time and time again that welfare dependents are democrats. Why in the hell do you think the dems promote welfare if the majority of recipients are republicans?

For god's sake- stop it- you make yourself look foolish.

81% of people receiving public housing benefits vote Democratic
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2016, 05:07 PM
 
Location: New Mexico
5,014 posts, read 7,401,352 times
Reputation: 8639
There will be a surge of women voters for Hillary like there was a surge of African American voters for Obama that gave him a larger margin of victory than expected. Lots of older women out there who will vote for Hillary for their daughters and granddaughters to have a female President.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2016, 05:09 PM
 
30,058 posts, read 18,652,475 times
Reputation: 20862
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeyCNY View Post
And yet, conservative red states are the ones dependent on welfare to survive, in the form of massive wealth redistribution from the wealthier blue state taxpayers.

And Trump hires illegal aliens and outsources his clothing line to Mexico and China.

I do agree on one thing, however: IQs are DEFINITELY declining. One look at Trump supporters is proof of this.
Oh my goodness.................. the same liberal canard!

STATES don't recieve welfare, PEOPLE recieve welfare. The MAJORITY of those on welfare ARE DEMOCRATS. It has been shown time and time again that welfare dependents are democrats. Why in the hell do you think the dems promote welfare if the majority of recipients are republicans?

For god's sake- stop it- you make yourself look foolish.

81% of people receiving public housing benefits vote Democratic

The politics and demographics of food stamp recipients | Pew Research Center
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2016, 05:10 PM
 
Location: Arlington VA
549 posts, read 625,344 times
Reputation: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedirtypirate View Post
the past eight years have been pretty good for everyone I know. Outside of the manufacturing sector around here, everything else has been good. Manufacturing started going down hill like 70 years. Clinton 2016. Sorry.

I agree. Nobody I know is unemployed or looking for work, or has a college degree and is forced to "flip burgers". I have an aunt in California who is going through some tough financial times because she bought a 5-bedroom house she couldn't afford in 2004, defaulted, went bankrupt, and now blames Obama.

The fact that unempoyment is 30% (or some other ridiculous number) is simply a GOP fantasy, and they derive that number by counting retirees, full-time students, and children as "unemployed and looking for work." LMAO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2016, 05:22 PM
 
1,020 posts, read 1,376,957 times
Reputation: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by GravityMan View Post
With this recent David Duke stuff, I can see Blacks and Hispanics, even those who don't particularly like Clinton, come out in droves to vote against Trump in the general to try and keep him out of office.
Exactly! Trump campaign events = KKK rallies
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2016, 05:41 PM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by aries63 View Post
There will be a surge of women voters for Hillary like there was a surge of African American voters for Obama that gave him a larger margin of victory than expected. Lots of older women out there who will vote for Hillary for their daughters and granddaughters to have a female President.
My wife would love to see a female president. She has said she would never vote for Hillary. She makes fun of me for voting for Vermin Supreme but I might have her on board this time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2016, 06:10 PM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,473,858 times
Reputation: 14398
Quote:
Originally Posted by fisheye View Post
In South Carolina 386,000 Democrats voted and 737,000 Republicans voted.

South Carolina is not a swing state. It's a red state. Expect it to be red for the general election.

Swing states can go red or blue. The remaining states likely will stay red or blue like the typically do.

Link to map which lists swing state and red/blue states:

The 2016 Results We Can Already Predict - POLITICO Magazine
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top