"Bernie can't have his proposals implemented", but "if Trump's proposal is implemented it would be disaster"? (Congress, nuclear)

[snowmountains]

One of the major argument against Sanders is that his proposals are too good to be true, that they would not pass the senate and congress.

However, the same people are against Trump for the reason that his hardline policies will be disasters, such as using the nuclear weapons ("his hand is at the button"), and the "wall", etc., etc.

So those same people (aka Clinton supporters) think Sanders can't realize his plans, but Trump can.

Apparently they think Trump will have the full support from the Senate and Congress, while Sanders doesn't.

[earthlyfather]

Good logic here

[snowmountains]

Thanks earthlyfather.

I really would like to hear more comments, especially any response from Clinton supporters who may have the said views/arguments against Trump and Sanders.

[PCALMike]

Originally Posted by snowmountains

Thanks earthlyfather.

I really would like to hear more comments, especially any response from Clinton supporters who may have the said views/arguments against Trump and Sanders.

Its the same type of logic when they say the GOP is influenced by big money (so we must get big money out of politics) and then they say that Hillary is not influenced by the big money she gets.

Or when they say it is really important with foreign policy experience and in the next sentence think Bill and Obama (who had less experience than Bernie) were great when it came to foreign policy and Hillary will continue it.