Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Everyone (or most everyone) seems to be touting HRC's foreign affairs "experience" over that of Sanders. Maybe I missed something, but what has her "experience" actually accomplished (that impacts us)? Did Obama pre-election have any more foreign affairs experience than Bernie has had? What's the big deal about experience esp if that experience has yielded little or nothing?
When you actually think about it, her foreign experience is THE main reason not to vote for her. She voted to go into Iraq and now she's ****ed up pretty much the entire Middle East with her Libya and Syria adventures. I'll paraphrase Donald Trump here, "we can't afford to be the World's police".
Oh, her experience has yielded something-just nothing positive. Americans are sick of constant warfare, our foreign policy being hijacked by war profiteers, and our military being used and abused by Puppet Politicians like Hillary.
Her good friend/mentor on foreign policy, Henry Kissinger once said that: Quote by Henry Kissinger: "Military Men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy"
I'd keep quiet on that "experience" if I were her. I often wonder if her supporters ignore stuff like this or are just ignorant on it.
Everyone (or most everyone) seems to be touting HRC's foreign affairs "experience" over that of Sanders. Maybe I missed something, but what has her "experience" actually accomplished (that impacts us)? Did Obama pre-election have any more foreign affairs experience than Bernie has had? What's the big deal about experience esp if that experience has yielded little or nothing?
Name one Secretary of State who wasn't the President's puppet?
Hilliary has lots of experience. True, but it is all bad experience.
If you were a CEO and hiring a high level exec would you consider Hilliary?
The reason Hilliary is leading Sanders is the large number of women voting for her because of gender.
If she is elected in the end perhaps she will return some of the items she took when her and hubby exited the whitehouse.
Hilliary has lots of experience. True, but it is all bad experience.
If you were a CEO and hiring a high level exec would you consider Hilliary?
The reason Hilliary is leading Sanders is the large number of women voting for her because of gender.
If she is elected in the end perhaps she will return some of the items she took when her and hubby exited the whitehouse.
The answer to your question is yes. She's well educated; with an impressive resume and presence. The private sector would snatch her up in a heartbeat.
Hilliary has lots of experience. True, but it is all bad experience.
If you were a CEO and hiring a high level exec would you consider Hilliary? The reason Hilliary is leading Sanders is the large number of women voting for her because of gender. If she is elected in the end perhaps she will return some of the items she took when her and hubby exited the whitehouse.
An off-topic question on my own thread—why is she sweeping the South? What is it about her and Southern voters?
On topic—she's bungled everything she's touched in foreign affairs. Why doesn't Bernie up-play that? Trump certainly will, full-guns.
The answer to your question is yes. She's well educated; with an impressive resume and presence. The private sector would snatch her up in a heartbeat.
Any corrupt private corporation.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.