Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The answer to your question is yes. She's well educated; with an impressive resume and presence. The private sector would snatch her up in a heartbeat.
Didn't Hillary lose her law license just like the Obama's? What is she qualified to do besides bring a rolodex full of connections??
The answer to your question is yes. She's well educated; with an impressive resume and presence. The private sector would snatch her up in a heartbeat.
She'll work for the big banks, like Dodd-Frank did.
Hilliary has lots of experience. True, but it is all bad experience.
If you were a CEO and hiring a high level exec would you consider Hilliary?
The reason Hilliary is leading Sanders is the large number of women voting for her because of gender.
If she is elected in the end perhaps she will return some of the items she took when her and hubby exited the whitehouse.
I think I read am article while back women are voting for Sanders or other candiates over Hillary. They mentioned how women want a female President, but they can wait they said.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,327 posts, read 54,350,985 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by mightleavenyc
When you actually think about it, her foreign experience is THE main reason not to vote for her. She voted to go into Iraq and now she's ****ed up pretty much the entire Middle East with her Libya and Syria adventures.
No, there never was a vote on whether to go or not go, that decision is owned by one man. And while she may not have gotten the milk & honey flowing in the streets the ME was pretty much ****ed up long before she was out of high school.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mightleavenyc
I'll paraphrase Donald Trump here, "we can't afford to be the World's police".
Doesn't really explain why he sees the need to spend MORE! MORE! MORE! on a military that already consumes more $$$ than the militaries of the next 7 nations combined then, eh?
An off-topic question on my own thread—why is she sweeping the South? What is it about her and Southern voters?
The main reason she has swept the south is low information black voters. She is winning massively in that group. They have been conditioned to vote Clinton for the past several decades and, except for 2008, when they had one of their own to vote for, they continue the trend.
Without that black support, Clinton would be facing a repeat of 2008.
Oh, her experience has yielded something-just nothing positive. Americans are sick of constant warfare, our foreign policy being hijacked by war profiteers, and our military being used and abused by Puppet Politicians like Hillary.
Whoever told you she started the wars lied to you.
Whoever told you she started the wars lied to you.
I didn't say she did-but she was certainly complicit at a time when Senator Sanders was speaking out against constant warfare and the consequences of it down the road (which have all proved him to be right).
I want a leader that considers the long term consequences for our nation, our budget and for our military, and not just the short term profit of defense contractors -of which there are few leaders to choose from. Hillary does not get off the hook, sorry.
Last edited by 2e1m5a; 03-10-2016 at 03:01 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.